Total
12467 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-0710 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-05-20 | 6.8 Medium |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from a privileged user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application that causes a host machine to crash. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker who already has a privileged account on a guest operating system, running as a virtual machine, could run a specially crafted application. The security update addresses the vulnerability by resolving a number of conditions where Hyper-V would fail to prevent a guest operating system from sending malicious requests. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0709 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0620 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Rt 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker could run a specially crafted application on a guest operating system that could cause the Hyper-V host operating system to execute arbitrary code. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Hyper-V validates guest operating system user input. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41606 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Nomad | 2025-05-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 1.0.2 up to 1.2.12, and 1.3.5 jobs submitted with an artifact stanza using invalid S3 or GCS URLs can be used to crash client agents. Fixed in 1.2.13, 1.3.6, and 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40923 | 1 Lief-project | 1 Lief | 2025-05-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the LIEF::MachO::SegmentCommand::virtual_address function of LIEF v0.12.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (DOS) through a segmentation fault via a crafted MachO file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2529 | 1 Cloudflare | 1 Goflow | 2025-05-20 | 7.5 High |
| sflow decode package does not employ sufficient packet sanitisation which can lead to a denial of service attack. Attackers can craft malformed packets causing the process to consume large amounts of memory resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12014 | 2025-05-20 | N/A | ||
| Path Traversal vulnerability in the eSignaViewer component in eSigna product versions 1.0 to 1.5 on all platforms allow an unauthenticated attacker to access arbitrary files in the document system via manipulation of file paths and object identifiers. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21686 | 2025-05-20 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43560 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2025-05-19 | 9.1 Critical |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.1, 2023.13, 2021.19 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security mechanisms and execute code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43559 | 1 Adobe | 1 Coldfusion | 2025-05-19 | 9.1 Critical |
| ColdFusion versions 2025.1, 2023.13, 2021.19 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security mechanisms and execute code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction and scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22233 | 2025-05-19 | 3.1 Low | ||
| CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks. Affected Spring Products and Versions Spring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.6 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.19 * 6.0.0 - 6.0.27 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.42 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected Mitigation Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix Version Availability 6.2.x 6.2.7 OSS6.1.x 6.1.20 OSS6.0.x 6.0.28 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x 5.3.43 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. Generally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation. For setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields. Credit This issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24549 | 4 Apache, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 6 Tomcat, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2025-05-19 | 7.5 High |
| Denial of Service due to improper input validation vulnerability for HTTP/2 requests in Apache Tomcat. When processing an HTTP/2 request, if the request exceeded any of the configured limits for headers, the associated HTTP/2 stream was not reset until after all of the headers had been processed.This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.0-M16, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.18, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.85, from 8.5.0 through 8.5.98. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0-M17, 10.1.19, 9.0.86 or 8.5.99 which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27043 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Python and 1 more | 7 Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager, Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility and 4 more | 2025-05-19 | 5.3 Medium |
| The email module of Python through 3.11.3 incorrectly parses e-mail addresses that contain a special character. The wrong portion of an RFC2822 header is identified as the value of the addr-spec. In some applications, an attacker can bypass a protection mechanism in which application access is granted only after verifying receipt of e-mail to a specific domain (e.g., only @company.example.com addresses may be used for signup). This occurs in email/_parseaddr.py in recent versions of Python. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22235 | 2025-05-16 | 7.3 High | ||
| EndpointRequest.to() creates a matcher for null/** if the actuator endpoint, for which the EndpointRequest has been created, is disabled or not exposed. Your application may be affected by this if all the following conditions are met: * You use Spring Security * EndpointRequest.to() has been used in a Spring Security chain configuration * The endpoint which EndpointRequest references is disabled or not exposed via web * Your application handles requests to /null and this path needs protection You are not affected if any of the following is true: * You don't use Spring Security * You don't use EndpointRequest.to() * The endpoint which EndpointRequest.to() refers to is enabled and is exposed * Your application does not handle requests to /null or this path does not need protection | ||||
| CVE-2025-4740 | 2025-05-16 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in BeamCtrl Airiana up to 11.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file coef. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4742 | 2025-05-16 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in XU-YIJIE grpo-flat up to 9024b43f091e2eb9bac65802b120c0b35f9ba856. Affected is the function main of the file grpo_vanilla.py. The manipulation leads to deserialization. Local access is required to approach this attack. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53827 | 2025-05-16 | 7.5 High | ||
| Ericsson Packet Core Controller (PCC) contains a vulnerability where an attacker sending a large volume of specially crafted messages may cause service degradation | ||||
| CVE-2024-52880 | 2025-05-16 | 7.9 High | ||
| An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O kernel 5.2 before version 05.29.50, kernel 5.3 before version 05.38.50, kernel 5.4 before version 05.46.50, kernel 5.5 before version 05.54.50, kernel 5.6 before version 05.61.50, and kernel 5.7 before version 05.70.50. In VariableRuntimeDxe driver, SecureBootHandler uses DataSize and VariableNameSize when determining if the data or name are in the buffer, but these are supplied by the caller and therefore cannot be trusted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4600 | 2025-05-16 | N/A | ||
| A request smuggling vulnerability existed in the Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer due to improper handling of chunked-encoded HTTP requests. This allowed attackers to craft requests that could be misinterpreted by backend servers. The issue was fixed by disallowing stray data after a chunk, and is no longer exploitable. No action is required as Classic Application Load Balancer service after 2025-04-26 is not vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24308 | 2025-05-16 | 7.5 High | ||
| Improper input validation in the UEFI firmware error handler for the Intel(R) Server D50DNP and M50FCP may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||