Filtered by vendor Djangoproject
Subscriptions
Total
126 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27556 | 2 Djangoproject, Microsoft | 2 Django, Windows | 2025-10-03 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.8 and 5.0 before 5.0.14. The NFKC normalization is slow on Windows. As a consequence, django.contrib.auth.views.LoginView, django.contrib.auth.views.LogoutView, and django.views.i18n.set_language are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56374 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-10-03 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-26699 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 1 more | 2025-10-03 | 5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.7, 5.0 before 5.0.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.20. The django.utils.text.wrap() method and wordwrap template filter are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59682 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-10-02 | 3.1 Low |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.25, 5.1 before 5.1.13, and 5.2 before 5.2.7. The django.utils.archive.extract() function, used by the "startapp --template" and "startproject --template" commands, allows partial directory traversal via an archive with file paths sharing a common prefix with the target directory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59681 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-10-02 | 7.1 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.25, 5.1 before 5.1.13, and 5.2 before 5.2.7. QuerySet.annotate(), QuerySet.alias(), QuerySet.aggregate(), and QuerySet.extra() are subject to SQL injection in column aliases, when using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed to these methods (on MySQL and MariaDB). | ||||
| CVE-2025-57833 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-09-08 | 7.1 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.24, 5.1 before 5.1.12, and 5.2 before 5.2.6. FilteredRelation is subject to SQL injection in column aliases, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the **kwargs passed QuerySet.annotate() or QuerySet.alias(). | ||||
| CVE-2025-32873 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.21, 5.1 before 5.1.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.1. The django.utils.html.strip_tags() function is vulnerable to a potential denial-of-service (slow performance) when processing inputs containing large sequences of incomplete HTML tags. The template filter striptags is also vulnerable, because it is built on top of strip_tags(). | ||||
| CVE-2024-53907 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer and 1 more | 2025-06-24 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. The strip_tags() method and striptags template filter are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs containing large sequences of nested incomplete HTML entities. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48432 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-06-24 | 4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.3, 5.1 before 5.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.23. Internal HTTP response logging does not escape request.path, which allows remote attackers to potentially manipulate log output via crafted URLs. This may lead to log injection or forgery when logs are viewed in terminals or processed by external systems. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38875 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 4.2 before 4.2.14 and 5.0 before 5.0.7. urlize and urlizetrunc were subject to a potential denial of service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of brackets. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39329 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-06-16 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. The django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend.authenticate() method allows remote attackers to enumerate users via a timing attack involving login requests for users with an unusable password. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39330 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-06-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. Derived classes of the django.core.files.storage.Storage base class, when they override generate_filename() without replicating the file-path validations from the parent class, potentially allow directory traversal via certain inputs during a save() call. (Built-in Storage sub-classes are unaffected.) | ||||
| CVE-2024-39614 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. get_supported_language_variant() was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53908 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 2 Django, Ansible Automation Platform | 2025-06-09 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.4, 5.0 before 5.0.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.17. Direct usage of the django.db.models.fields.json.HasKey lookup, when an Oracle database is used, is subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as an lhs value. (Applications that use the jsonfield.has_key lookup via __ are unaffected.) | ||||
| CVE-2021-45116 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Fedora, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-22 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. Due to leveraging the Django Template Language's variable resolution logic, the dictsort template filter was potentially vulnerable to information disclosure, or an unintended method call, if passed a suitably crafted key. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24680 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-05-15 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.24, 4.2 before 4.2.10, and Django 5.0 before 5.0.2. The intcomma template filter was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41323 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Rhui, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-05-14 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.16, 4.0 before 4.0.8, and 4.1 before 4.1.2, internationalized URLs were subject to a potential denial of service attack via the locale parameter, which is treated as a regular expression. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12794 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Django 1.10.x before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.5, HTML autoescaping was disabled in a portion of the template for the technical 500 debug page. Given the right circumstances, this allowed a cross-site scripting attack. This vulnerability shouldn't affect most production sites since you shouldn't run with "DEBUG = True" (which makes this page accessible) in your production settings. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7234 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A maliciously crafted URL to a Django (1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18) site using the ``django.views.static.serve()`` view could redirect to any other domain, aka an open redirect vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7233 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Openstack, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Django 1.10 before 1.10.7, 1.9 before 1.9.13, and 1.8 before 1.8.18 relies on user input in some cases to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security check for these redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) considered some numeric URLs "safe" when they shouldn't be, aka an open redirect vulnerability. Also, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could suffer from an XSS attack. | ||||