Filtered by vendor Openssl Subscriptions
Total 265 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2014-0198 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Mariadb and 4 more 11 Debian Linux, Fedora, Mariadb and 8 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The do_ssl3_write function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL 1.x through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, does not properly manage a buffer pointer during certain recursive calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via vectors that trigger an alert condition.
CVE-2016-0800 3 Openssl, Pulsesecure, Redhat 11 Openssl, Client, Steel Belted Radius and 8 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to send a ServerVerify message before establishing that a client possesses certain plaintext RSA data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, aka a "DROWN" attack.
CVE-2016-2109 2 Openssl, Redhat 12 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 9 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The asn1_d2i_read_bio function in crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c in the ASN.1 BIO implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a short invalid encoding.
CVE-2014-3566 11 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 8 more 28 Mac Os X, Debian Linux, Fedora and 25 more 2025-04-12 3.4 Low
The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue.
CVE-2015-4000 13 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 10 more 31 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Safari and 28 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue.
CVE-2016-2105 8 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 5 more 20 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 17 more 2025-04-12 7.5 High
Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data.
CVE-2016-2108 3 Google, Openssl, Redhat 13 Android, Openssl, Enterprise Linux and 10 more 2025-04-12 N/A
The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer underflow and memory corruption) via an ANY field in crafted serialized data, aka the "negative zero" issue.
CVE-2014-0224 9 Fedoraproject, Filezilla-project, Mariadb and 6 more 23 Fedora, Filezilla Server, Mariadb and 20 more 2025-04-12 7.4 High
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability.
CVE-2016-6306 7 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 4 more 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Icewall Federation Agent and 8 more 2025-04-12 5.9 Medium
The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via crafted certificate operations, related to s3_clnt.c and s3_srvr.c.
CVE-2010-2939 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2025-04-11 N/A
Double free vulnerability in the ssl3_get_key_exchange function in the OpenSSL client (ssl/s3_clnt.c) in OpenSSL 1.0.0a, 0.9.8, 0.9.7, and possibly other versions, when using ECDH, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted private key with an invalid prime. NOTE: some sources refer to this as a use-after-free issue.
CVE-2013-0169 4 Openssl, Oracle, Polarssl and 1 more 11 Openssl, Openjdk, Polarssl and 8 more 2025-04-11 N/A
The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue.
CVE-2012-0027 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2025-04-11 N/A
The GOST ENGINE in OpenSSL before 1.0.0f does not properly handle invalid parameters for the GOST block cipher, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via crafted data from a TLS client.
CVE-2012-0050 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2025-04-11 N/A
OpenSSL 0.9.8s and 1.0.0f does not properly support DTLS applications, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via unspecified vectors related to an out-of-bounds read. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4108.
CVE-2011-3207 2 Openssl, Redhat 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux 2025-04-11 N/A
crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.x before 1.0.0e does not initialize certain structure members, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass CRL validation by using a nextUpdate value corresponding to a time in the past.
CVE-2011-4109 2 Openssl, Redhat 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more 2025-04-11 N/A
Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8s, when X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled, allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact by triggering failure of a policy check.
CVE-2012-2131 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2025-04-11 N/A
Multiple integer signedness errors in crypto/buffer/buffer.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8v allow remote attackers to conduct buffer overflow attacks, and cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact, via crafted DER data, as demonstrated by an X.509 certificate or an RSA public key. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-2110.
CVE-2011-4577 2 Openssl, Redhat 2 Openssl, Enterprise Linux 2025-04-11 N/A
OpenSSL before 0.9.8s and 1.x before 1.0.0f, when RFC 3779 support is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure) via an X.509 certificate containing certificate-extension data associated with (1) IP address blocks or (2) Autonomous System (AS) identifiers.
CVE-2010-0740 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2025-04-11 N/A
The ssl3_get_record function in ssl/s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8f through 0.9.8m allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a malformed record in a TLS connection that triggers a NULL pointer dereference, related to the minor version number. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
CVE-2012-2333 2 Openssl, Redhat 5 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
Integer underflow in OpenSSL before 0.9.8x, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0j, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1c, when TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, or DTLS is used with CBC encryption, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted TLS packet that is not properly handled during a certain explicit IV calculation.
CVE-2011-1473 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2025-04-11 N/A
OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment