Filtered by vendor Nodejs
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Node.js
Subscriptions
Total
158 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-15896 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| Node.js was affected by OpenSSL vulnerability CVE-2017-3737 in regards to the use of SSL_read() due to TLS handshake failure. The result was that an active network attacker could send application data to Node.js using the TLS or HTTP2 modules in a way that bypassed TLS authentication and encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15897 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 3.1 Low |
| Node.js had a bug in versions 8.X and 9.X which caused buffers to not be initialized when the encoding for the fill value did not match the encoding specified. For example, 'Buffer.alloc(0x100, "This is not correctly encoded", "hex");' The buffer implementation was updated such that the buffer will be initialized to all zeros in these cases. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3731 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 4 Node.js, Openssl, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3732 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 5 Node.js, Openssl, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3738 | 4 Debian, Nodejs, Openssl and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Openssl and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9840 | 9 Apple, Boost, Canonical and 6 more | 26 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 23 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6306 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 4 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Icewall Federation Agent and 8 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via crafted certificate operations, related to s3_clnt.c and s3_srvr.c. | ||||
| CVE-2015-6764 | 4 Debian, Google, Nodejs and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Chrome, Node.js and 1 more | 2025-04-12 | 9.8 Critical |
| The BasicJsonStringifier::SerializeJSArray function in json-stringifier.h in the JSON stringifier in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 47.0.2526.73, improperly loads array elements, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds memory access) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JavaScript code. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8027 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Node.js 0.12.x before 0.12.9, 4.x before 4.2.3, and 5.x before 5.1.1 does not ensure the availability of a parser for each HTTP socket, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uncaughtException and service outage) via a pipelined HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0702 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 2 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.1 Medium |
| The MOD_EXP_CTIME_COPY_FROM_PREBUF function in crypto/bn/bn_exp.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not properly consider cache-bank access times during modular exponentiation, which makes it easier for local users to discover RSA keys by running a crafted application on the same Intel Sandy Bridge CPU core as a victim and leveraging cache-bank conflicts, aka a "CacheBleed" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0797 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 2 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| Multiple integer overflows in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption or NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long digit string that is mishandled by the (1) BN_dec2bn or (2) BN_hex2bn function, related to crypto/bn/bn.h and crypto/bn/bn_print.c. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1669 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Google and 3 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Chrome and 8 more | 2025-04-12 | 8.8 High |
| The Zone::New function in zone.cc in Google V8 before 5.0.71.47, as used in Google Chrome before 50.0.2661.102, does not properly determine when to expand certain memory allocations, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JavaScript code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2086 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.42, 0.12.x before 0.12.10, 4.x before 4.3.0, and 5.x before 5.6.0 allow remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a crafted Content-Length HTTP header. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2105 | 8 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 5 more | 20 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 17 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2107 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Google and 5 more | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Android and 15 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6668 | 4 Debian, Google, Nodejs and 1 more | 7 Debian Linux, Chrome, V8 and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google V8 before 3.24.35.10, as used in Google Chrome before 33.0.1750.146, allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have other impact via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2178 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 4 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 7 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations, which makes it easier for local users to discover a DSA private key via a timing side-channel attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2183 | 6 Cisco, Nodejs, Openssl and 3 more | 14 Content Security Management Appliance, Node.js, Openssl and 11 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2216 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The HTTP header parsing code in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.42, 0.11.6 through 0.11.16, 0.12.x before 0.12.10, 4.x before 4.3.0, and 5.x before 5.6.0 allows remote attackers to bypass an HTTP response-splitting protection mechanism via UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters in the HTTP header, as demonstrated by %c4%8d%c4%8a. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3956 | 3 Ibm, Nodejs, Npmjs | 3 Sdk, Node.js, Npm | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The CLI in npm before 2.15.1 and 3.x before 3.8.3, as used in Node.js 0.10 before 0.10.44, 0.12 before 0.12.13, 4 before 4.4.2, and 5 before 5.10.0, includes bearer tokens with arbitrary requests, which allows remote HTTP servers to obtain sensitive information by reading Authorization headers. | ||||