Total
563 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-28228 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-01-23 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-28226 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 5 more | 2025-01-23 | 5.3 Medium |
| Windows Enroll Engine Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-4418 | 2 Acronis, Microsoft | 2 Cyber Protect Home Office, Windows | 2025-01-22 | 7.8 High |
| Local privilege escalation due to unrestricted loading of unsigned libraries. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office (Windows) before build 40208. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33185 | 1 Django-ses Project | 1 Django-ses | 2025-01-14 | 4.6 Medium |
| Django-SES is a drop-in mail backend for Django. The django_ses library implements a mail backend for Django using AWS Simple Email Service. The library exports the `SESEventWebhookView class` intended to receive signed requests from AWS to handle email bounces, subscriptions, etc. These requests are signed by AWS and are verified by django_ses, however the verification of this signature was found to be flawed as it allowed users to specify arbitrary public certificates. This issue was patched in version 3.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34205 | 1 Moov | 1 Signedxml | 2025-01-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| In Moov signedxml through 1.0.0, parsing the raw XML (as received) can result in different output than parsing the canonicalized XML. Thus, signature validation can be bypassed via a Signature Wrapping attack (aka XSW). | ||||
| CVE-2023-28602 | 1 Zoom | 1 Zoom | 2025-01-02 | 2.8 Low |
| Zoom for Windows clients prior to 5.13.5 contain an improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability. A malicious user may potentially downgrade Zoom Client components to previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34120 | 2 Microsoft, Zoom | 2 Windows, Virtual Desktop Infrastructure | 2025-01-02 | 8.7 High |
| Improper privilege management in Zoom for Windows, Zoom Rooms for Windows, and Zoom VDI for Windows clients before 5.14.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable an escalation of privilege via local access. Users may potentially utilize higher level system privileges maintained by the Zoom client to spawn processes with escalated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35373 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Mono | 2025-01-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| Mono Authenticode Validation Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-54150 | 2024-12-20 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| cjwt is a C JSON Web Token (JWT) Implementation. Algorithm confusion occurs when a system improperly verifies the type of signature used, allowing attackers to exploit the lack of distinction between signing methods. If the system doesn't differentiate between an HMAC signed token and an RS/EC/PS signed token during verification, it becomes vulnerable to this kind of attack. For instance, an attacker could craft a token with the alg field set to "HS256" while the server expects an asymmetric algorithm like "RS256". The server might mistakenly use the wrong verification method, such as using a public key as the HMAC secret, leading to unauthorised access. For RSA, the key can be computed from a few signatures. For Elliptic Curve (EC), two potential keys can be recovered from one signature. This can be used to bypass the signature mechanism if an application relies on asymmetrically signed tokens. This issue has been addressed in version 2.3.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21988 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2024-12-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.7.0.9 and 11.8.0.5 are susceptible to disclosure of sensitive information via complex MiTM attacks due to a vulnerability in the SSH cryptographic implementation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54126 | 1 Tp-link | 1 Archer C50 Firmware | 2024-12-05 | N/A |
| This vulnerability exists in the TP-Link Archer C50 due to improper signature verification mechanism in the firmware upgrade process at its web interface. An attacker with administrative privileges within the router’s Wi-Fi range could exploit this vulnerability by uploading and executing malicious firmware which could lead to complete compromise of the targeted device. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32449 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2024-12-04 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerStore versions prior to 3.5 contain an improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability. An attacker can trick a high privileged user to install a malicious binary by bypassing the existing cryptographic signature checks | ||||
| CVE-2018-0114 | 1 Cisco | 1 Node-jose | 2024-12-02 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco node-jose open source library before 0.11.0 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to re-sign tokens using a key that is embedded within the token. The vulnerability is due to node-jose following the JSON Web Signature (JWS) standard for JSON Web Tokens (JWTs). This standard specifies that a JSON Web Key (JWK) representing a public key can be embedded within the header of a JWS. This public key is then trusted for verification. An attacker could exploit this by forging valid JWS objects by removing the original signature, adding a new public key to the header, and then signing the object using the (attacker-owned) private key associated with the public key embedded in that JWS header. | ||||
| CVE-2018-18689 | 14 Apple, Avanquest, Foxitsoftware and 11 more | 20 Macos, Expert Pdf Ultimate, Pdf Experte Ultimate and 17 more | 2024-11-27 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Portable Document Format (PDF) specification does not provide any information regarding the concrete procedure of how to validate signatures. Consequently, a Signature Wrapping vulnerability exists in multiple products. An attacker can use /ByteRange and xref manipulations that are not detected by the signature-validation logic. This affects Foxit Reader before 9.4 and PhantomPDF before 8.3.9 and 9.x before 9.4. It also affects eXpert PDF 12 Ultimate, Expert PDF Reader, Nitro Pro, Nitro Reader, PDF Architect 6, PDF Editor 6 Pro, PDF Experte 9 Ultimate, PDFelement6 Pro, PDF Studio Viewer 2018, PDF Studio Pro, PDF-XChange Editor and Viewer, Perfect PDF 10 Premium, Perfect PDF Reader, Soda PDF, and Soda PDF Desktop. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50714 | 1 Yiiframework | 1 Yii2-authclient | 2024-11-27 | 6.8 Medium |
| yii2-authclient is an extension that adds OpenID, OAuth, OAuth2 and OpenId Connect consumers for the Yii framework 2.0. In yii2-authclient prior to version 2.2.15, the Oauth2 PKCE implementation is vulnerable in 2 ways. First, the `authCodeVerifier` should be removed after usage (similar to `authState`). Second, there is a risk for a `downgrade attack` if PKCE is being relied on for CSRF protection. Version 2.2.15 contains a patch for the issue. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23432 | 1 Hihonor | 2 Nth-an00, Nth-an00 Firmware | 2024-11-27 | 7.3 High |
| Some Honor products are affected by signature management vulnerability, successful exploitation could cause the forged system file overwrite the correct system file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52958 | 1 Galaxy Software Services Corporation | 1 Iota C.ai Conversational Platform | 2024-11-27 | N/A |
| A improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in plugin management in iota C.ai Conversational Platform from 1.0.0 through 2.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to load a malicious DLL via upload plugin function. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53267 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Sigstore-java | 2024-11-26 | 5.5 Medium |
| sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. sigstore-java has insufficient verification for a situation where a validly-signed but "mismatched" bundle is presented as proof of inclusion into a transparency log. This bug impacts clients using any variation of KeylessVerifier.verify(). The verifier may accept a bundle with an unrelated log entry, cryptographically verifying everything but fails to ensure the log entry applies to the artifact in question, thereby "verifying" a bundle without any proof the signing event was logged. This allows the creation of a bundle without fulcio certificate and private key combined with an unrelated but time-correct log entry to fake logging of a signing event. A malicious actor using a compromised identity may want to do this to prevent discovery via rekor's log monitors. The signer's identity will still be available to the verifier. The signature on the bundle must still be on the correct artifact for the verifier to pass. sigstore-gradle-plugin and sigstore-maven-plugin are not affected by this as they only provide signing functionality. This issue has been patched in v1.1.0 release with PR #856. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2020-3308 | 1 Cisco | 2 Firepower Threat Defense, Secure Firewall Management Center | 2024-11-26 | 4.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Image Signature Verification feature of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator-level credentials to install a malicious software patch on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper verification of digital signatures for patch images. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting an unsigned software patch to bypass signature checks and loading it on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to boot a malicious software patch image. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15374 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2024-11-26 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Image Verification feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install a malicious software image or file on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to the affected software improperly verifying digital signatures for software images and files that are uploaded to a device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a malicious software image or file to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass digital signature verification checks for software images and files and install a malicious software image or file on the affected device. | ||||