Total
2992 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-25093 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the set_qos function with the class_name variable.. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25092 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the handle_interface_acl function with the interface and out_acl variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25091 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the handle_interface_acl function with the interface variable when out_acl is -1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25090 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the handle_interface_acl function with the interface and in_acl variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25089 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the handle_interface_acl function with the interface variable when in_acl is -1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25088 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the index and description variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25087 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the index and to_dport variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25086 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the index and dport variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25085 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the index and to_dst variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25084 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the ip, mac and description variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25083 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the ip and mac variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25082 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the old_ip and old_mac variables. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25081 | 1 Milesight | 2 Ur32l, Ur32l Firmware | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the vtysh_ubus binary of Milesight UR32L v32.3.0.5 due to the use of an unsafe sprintf pattern. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker with high privileges can send HTTP requests to trigger these vulnerabilities.This buffer overflow occurs in the firewall_handler_set function with the src and dmz variables. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3786 | 4 Fedoraproject, Nodejs, Openssl and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Node.js, Openssl and 1 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3602 | 5 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 5 Fedora, Clustered Data Ontap, Node.js and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6). | ||||
| CVE-2022-23125 | 2 Debian, Netatalk | 2 Debian Linux, Netatalk | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Netatalk. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the copyapplfile function. When parsing the len element, the process does not properly validate the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-15869. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23122 | 2 Debian, Netatalk | 2 Debian Linux, Netatalk | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Netatalk. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the setfilparams function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-15837. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0194 | 2 Debian, Netatalk | 2 Debian Linux, Netatalk | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Netatalk. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the ad_addcomment function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-15876. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25580 | 2 Qt, Redhat | 2 Qt, Enterprise Linux | 2025-11-04 | 6.2 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in gui/util/qktxhandler.cpp in Qt before 5.15.17, 6.x before 6.2.12, 6.3.x through 6.5.x before 6.5.5, and 6.6.x before 6.6.2. A buffer overflow and application crash can occur via a crafted KTX image file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25393 | 1 Rt-thread | 1 Rt-thread | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| A stack buffer overflow occurs in net/at/src/at_server.c in RT-Thread through 5.0.2. | ||||