Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Rhui
Subscriptions
Total
43 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-27351 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.25, 4.2 before 4.2.11, and 5.0 before 5.0.3, the django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and the truncatewords_html template filter are subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack via a crafted string. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24680 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.24, 4.2 before 4.2.10, and Django 5.0 before 5.0.2. The intcomma template filter was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49082 | 2 Aiohttp, Redhat | 5 Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP method. The vulnerability occurs only if the attacker can control the HTTP method (GET, POST etc.) of the request. If the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request it will be able to modify the request (request smuggling). This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49081 | 2 Aiohttp, Redhat | 5 Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.2 High |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Improper validation made it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP request (e.g. to insert a new header) or create a new HTTP request if the attacker controls the HTTP version. The vulnerability only occurs if the attacker can control the HTTP version of the request. This issue has been patched in version 3.9.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43665 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.22, 4.1 before 4.1.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.6, the django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41164 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.21, 4.1 before 4.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.5, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri() is subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36053 | 4 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 8 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora and 5 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.20, 4 before 4.1.10, and 4.2 before 4.2.3, EmailValidator and URLValidator are subject to a potential ReDoS (regular expression denial of service) attack via a very large number of domain name labels of emails and URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42005 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. QuerySet.values() and values_list() methods on models with a JSONField are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted JSON object key as a passed *arg. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41991 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters, and the AdminURLFieldWidget widget, are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41990 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. The urlize() and urlizetrunc() template filters are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via very large inputs with a specific sequence of characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41989 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 1 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. The floatformat template filter is subject to significant memory consumption when given a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39614 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.7 and 4.2 before 4.2.14. get_supported_language_variant() was subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings containing specific characters. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4340 | 1 Redhat | 5 Ansible Automation Platform, Openstack, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| Passing a heavily nested list to sqlparse.parse() leads to a Denial of Service due to RecursionError. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34064 | 3 Fedoraproject, Palletsprojects, Redhat | 12 Fedora, Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform and 9 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. The `xmlattr` filter in affected versions of Jinja accepts keys containing non-attribute characters. XML/HTML attributes cannot contain spaces, `/`, `>`, or `=`, as each would then be interpreted as starting a separate attribute. If an application accepts keys (as opposed to only values) as user input, and renders these in pages that other users see as well, an attacker could use this to inject other attributes and perform XSS. The fix for CVE-2024-22195 only addressed spaces but not other characters. Accepting keys as user input is now explicitly considered an unintended use case of the `xmlattr` filter, and code that does so without otherwise validating the input should be flagged as insecure, regardless of Jinja version. Accepting _values_ as user input continues to be safe. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22195 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 9 Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 6 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49083 | 2 Cryptography.io, Redhat | 5 Cryptography, Ansible Automation Platform, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. Calling `load_pem_pkcs7_certificates` or `load_der_pkcs7_certificates` could lead to a NULL-pointer dereference and segfault. Exploitation of this vulnerability poses a serious risk of Denial of Service (DoS) for any application attempting to deserialize a PKCS7 blob/certificate. The consequences extend to potential disruptions in system availability and stability. This vulnerability has been patched in version 41.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30608 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Sqlparse Project | 5 Debian Linux, Rhui, Satellite and 2 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| sqlparse is a non-validating SQL parser module for Python. In affected versions the SQL parser contains a regular expression that is vulnerable to ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service). This issue was introduced by commit `e75e358`. The vulnerability may lead to Denial of Service (DoS). This issues has been fixed in sqlparse 0.4.4 by commit `c457abd5f`. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30251 | 3 Aio-libs Project, Aiohttp, Redhat | 4 Aiohttp, Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform and 1 more | 2025-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. In affected versions an attacker can send a specially crafted POST (multipart/form-data) request. When the aiohttp server processes it, the server will enter an infinite loop and be unable to process any further requests. An attacker can stop the application from serving requests after sending a single request. This issue has been addressed in version 3.9.4. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may manually apply a patch to their systems. Please see the linked GHSA for instructions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27306 | 3 Aiohttp, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Aiohttp, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-03 | 6.1 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. A XSS vulnerability exists on index pages for static file handling. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.9.4. We have always recommended using a reverse proxy server (e.g. nginx) for serving static files. Users following the recommendation are unaffected. Other users can disable `show_index` if unable to upgrade. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23829 | 3 Aiohttp, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Aiohttp, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Security-sensitive parts of the Python HTTP parser retained minor differences in allowable character sets, that must trigger error handling to robustly match frame boundaries of proxies in order to protect against injection of additional requests. Additionally, validation could trigger exceptions that were not handled consistently with processing of other malformed input. Being more lenient than internet standards require could, depending on deployment environment, assist in request smuggling. The unhandled exception could cause excessive resource consumption on the application server and/or its logging facilities. This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-47627. Version 3.9.2 fixes this vulnerability. | ||||