Filtered by vendor Elliptic Project
Subscriptions
Total
4 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-14505 | 1 Elliptic Project | 1 Elliptic | 2026-01-09 | 5.6 Medium |
| The ECDSA implementation of the Elliptic package generates incorrect signatures if an interim value of 'k' (as computed based on step 3.2 of RFC 6979 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6979 ) has leading zeros and is susceptible to cryptanalysis, which can lead to secret key exposure. This happens, because the byte-length of 'k' is incorrectly computed, resulting in its getting truncated during the computation. Legitimate transactions or communications will be broken as a result. Furthermore, due to the nature of the fault, attackers could–under certain conditions–derive the secret key, if they could get their hands on both a faulty signature generated by a vulnerable version of Elliptic and a correct signature for the same inputs. This issue affects all known versions of Elliptic (at the time of writing, versions less than or equal to 6.6.1). | ||||
| CVE-2024-42461 | 2 Elliptic Project, Redhat | 4 Elliptic, Acm, Multicluster Engine and 1 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because BER-encoded signatures are allowed. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42460 | 3 Elliptic Project, Indutny, Redhat | 5 Elliptic, Elliptic, Acm and 2 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing check for whether the leading bit of r and s is zero. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42459 | 3 Elliptic Project, Indutny, Redhat | 5 Elliptic, Elliptic, Acm and 2 more | 2025-11-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus zero-valued bytes can be removed or appended. | ||||
Page 1 of 1.