Filtered by vendor Postgresql
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Postgresql
Subscriptions
Total
169 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-32305 | 2 Aiven, Postgresql | 2 Aiven, Postgresql | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| aiven-extras is a PostgreSQL extension. Versions prior to 1.1.9 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability, allowing elevation to superuser inside PostgreSQL databases that use the aiven-extras package. The vulnerability leverages missing schema qualifiers on privileged functions called by the aiven-extras extension. A low privileged user can create objects that collide with existing function names, which will then be executed instead. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow a low privileged user to acquire `superuser` privileges, which would allow full, unrestricted access to all data and database functions. And could lead to arbitrary code execution or data access on the underlying host as the `postgres` user. The issue has been patched as of version 1.1.9. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10979 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 7 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-02-11 | 8.8 High |
| Incorrect control of environment variables in PostgreSQL PL/Perl allows an unprivileged database user to change sensitive process environment variables (e.g. PATH). That often suffices to enable arbitrary code execution, even if the attacker lacks a database server operating system user. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2455 | 3 Fedoraproject, Postgresql, Redhat | 9 Fedora, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-01-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| Row security policies disregard user ID changes after inlining; PostgreSQL could permit incorrect policies to be applied in certain cases where role-specific policies are used and a given query is planned under one role and then executed under other roles. This scenario can happen under security definer functions or when a common user and query is planned initially and then re-used across multiple SET ROLEs. Applying an incorrect policy may permit a user to complete otherwise-forbidden reads and modifications. This affects only databases that have used CREATE POLICY to define a row security policy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7348 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 7 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in pg_dump in PostgreSQL allows an object creator to execute arbitrary SQL functions as the user running pg_dump, which is often a superuser. The attack involves replacing another relation type with a view or foreign table. The attack requires waiting for pg_dump to start, but winning the race condition is trivial if the attacker retains an open transaction. Versions before PostgreSQL 16.4, 15.8, 14.13, 13.16, and 12.20 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2625 | 3 Fedoraproject, Postgresql, Redhat | 8 Fedora, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.0 High |
| A vulnerability was found in PostgreSQL. This attack requires permission to create non-temporary objects in at least one schema, the ability to lure or wait for an administrator to create or update an affected extension in that schema, and the ability to lure or wait for a victim to use the object targeted in CREATE OR REPLACE or CREATE IF NOT EXISTS. Given all three prerequisites, this flaw allows an attacker to run arbitrary code as the victim role, which may be a superuser. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1552 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 5 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL. There is an issue with incomplete efforts to operate safely when a privileged user is maintaining another user's objects. The Autovacuum, REINDEX, CREATE INDEX, REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW, CLUSTER, and pg_amcheck commands activated relevant protections too late or not at all during the process. This flaw allows an attacker with permission to create non-temporary objects in at least one schema to execute arbitrary SQL functions under a superuser identity. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43767 | 1 Postgresql | 1 Postgresql | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| Odyssey passes to client unencrypted bytes from man-in-the-middle When Odyssey storage is configured to use the PostgreSQL server using 'trust' authentication with a 'clientcert' requirement or to use 'cert' authentication, a man-in-the-middle attacker can inject false responses to the client's first few queries. Despite the use of SSL certificate verification and encryption, Odyssey will pass these results to client as if they originated from valid server. This is similar to CVE-2021-23222 for PostgreSQL. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3677 | 3 Fedoraproject, Postgresql, Redhat | 9 Fedora, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in postgresql. A purpose-crafted query can read arbitrary bytes of server memory. In the default configuration, any authenticated database user can complete this attack at will. The attack does not require the ability to create objects. If server settings include max_worker_processes=0, the known versions of this attack are infeasible. However, undiscovered variants of the attack may be independent of that setting. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3393 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 5 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| An information leak was discovered in postgresql in versions before 13.2, before 12.6 and before 11.11. A user having UPDATE permission but not SELECT permission to a particular column could craft queries which, under some circumstances, might disclose values from that column in error messages. An attacker could use this flaw to obtain information stored in a column they are allowed to write but not read. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32029 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 5 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in postgresql. Using an UPDATE ... RETURNING command on a purpose-crafted table, an authenticated database user could read arbitrary bytes of server memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32028 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 5 Postgresql, Ansible Automation Platform, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in postgresql. Using an INSERT ... ON CONFLICT ... DO UPDATE command on a purpose-crafted table, an authenticated database user could read arbitrary bytes of server memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32027 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 7 Postgresql, Ansible Automation Platform, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in postgresql in versions before 13.3, before 12.7, before 11.12, before 10.17 and before 9.6.22. While modifying certain SQL array values, missing bounds checks let authenticated database users write arbitrary bytes to a wide area of server memory. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23222 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 3 Postgresql, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| A man-in-the-middle attacker can inject false responses to the client's first few queries, despite the use of SSL certificate verification and encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23214 | 3 Fedoraproject, Postgresql, Redhat | 7 Fedora, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| When the server is configured to use trust authentication with a clientcert requirement or to use cert authentication, a man-in-the-middle attacker can inject arbitrary SQL queries when a connection is first established, despite the use of SSL certificate verification and encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2021-20229 | 3 Fedoraproject, Postgresql, Redhat | 4 Fedora, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL in versions before 13.2. This flaw allows a user with SELECT privilege on one column to craft a special query that returns all columns of the table. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2020-25696 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the psql interactive terminal of PostgreSQL in versions before 13.1, before 12.5, before 11.10, before 10.15, before 9.6.20 and before 9.5.24. If an interactive psql session uses \gset when querying a compromised server, the attacker can execute arbitrary code as the operating system account running psql. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2020-25695 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL versions before 13.1, before 12.5, before 11.10, before 10.15, before 9.6.20 and before 9.5.24. An attacker having permission to create non-temporary objects in at least one schema can execute arbitrary SQL functions under the identity of a superuser. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2020-25694 | 3 Debian, Postgresql, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Postgresql, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL versions before 13.1, before 12.5, before 11.10, before 10.15, before 9.6.20 and before 9.5.24. If a client application that creates additional database connections only reuses the basic connection parameters while dropping security-relevant parameters, an opportunity for a man-in-the-middle attack, or the ability to observe clear-text transmissions, could exist. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2020-21469 | 1 Postgresql | 1 Postgresql | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in PostgreSQL 12.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via repeatedly sending SIGHUP signals. NOTE: this is disputed by the vendor because untrusted users cannot send SIGHUP signals; they can only be sent by a PostgreSQL superuser, a user with pg_reload_conf access, or a user with sufficient privileges at the OS level (the postgres account or the root account). | ||||
| CVE-2020-1720 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 8 Postgresql, Decision Manager, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL's "ALTER ... DEPENDS ON EXTENSION", where sub-commands did not perform authorization checks. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw in certain configurations to perform drop objects such as function, triggers, et al., leading to database corruption. This issue affects PostgreSQL versions before 12.2, before 11.7, before 10.12 and before 9.6.17. | ||||