Filtered by vendor Synology
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Diskstation Manager
Subscriptions
Total
110 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-13280 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Use of insufficiently random values vulnerability in SYNO.Encryption.GenRandomKey in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2-23739 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to compromise non-HTTPS sessions via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2018-13281 | 1 Synology | 3 Diskstation Manager, Skynas, Vs960hd | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Information exposure vulnerability in SYNO.Core.ACL in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2-23739-2 allows remote authenticated users to determine the existence and obtain the metadata of arbitrary files via the file_path parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2018-13284 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Command injection vulnerability in ftpd in Synology Diskstation Manager (DSM) before 6.2-23739-1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via the (1) MKD or (2) RMD command. | ||||
| CVE-2018-13286 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Incorrect default permissions vulnerability in synouser.conf in Synology Diskstation Manager (DSM) before 6.2-23739-1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via the world readable configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2018-13291 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Information exposure vulnerability in /usr/syno/etc/mount.conf in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.1-23824 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via the world readable configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2018-13293 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Control Panel SSO Settings in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.1-23824 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the URL parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2018-7170 | 4 Hpe, Netapp, Ntp and 1 more | 10 Hpux-ntp, Hci, Solidfire and 7 more | 2025-01-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| ntpd in ntp 4.2.x before 4.2.8p7 and 4.3.x before 4.3.92 allows authenticated users that know the private symmetric key to create arbitrarily-many ephemeral associations in order to win the clock selection of ntpd and modify a victim's clock via a Sybil attack. This issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-1549. | ||||
| CVE-2018-7184 | 5 Canonical, Netapp, Ntp and 2 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Cloud Backup, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 7 more | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| ntpd in ntp 4.2.8p4 before 4.2.8p11 drops bad packets before updating the "received" timestamp, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disruption) by sending a packet with a zero-origin timestamp causing the association to reset and setting the contents of the packet as the most recent timestamp. This issue is a result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-7704. | ||||
| CVE-2018-7185 | 6 Canonical, Hpe, Netapp and 3 more | 23 Ubuntu Linux, Hpux-ntp, Hci and 20 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| The protocol engine in ntp 4.2.6 before 4.2.8p11 allows a remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disruption) by continually sending a packet with a zero-origin timestamp and source IP address of the "other side" of an interleaved association causing the victim ntpd to reset its association. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8916 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Unverified password change vulnerability in Change Password in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2-23739 allows remote authenticated users to reset password without verification. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8917 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in info.cgi in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.1.6-15266 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the host parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8919 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| Information exposure vulnerability in SYNO.Core.Desktop.SessionData in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.1.6-15266 allows remote attackers to steal credentials via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2018-8920 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | 7.2 High |
| Improper neutralization of escape vulnerability in Log Exporter in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.1.6-15266 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary content to have an unspecified impact by exporting an archive in CSV format. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14907 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 7 more | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| All samba versions 4.9.x before 4.9.18, 4.10.x before 4.10.12 and 4.11.x before 4.11.5 have an issue where if it is set with "log level = 3" (or above) then the string obtained from the client, after a failed character conversion, is printed. Such strings can be provided during the NTLMSSP authentication exchange. In the Samba AD DC in particular, this may cause a long-lived process(such as the RPC server) to terminate. (In the file server case, the most likely target, smbd, operates as process-per-client and so a crash there is harmless). | ||||
| CVE-2019-19344 | 4 Canonical, Opensuse, Samba and 1 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Leap, Samba and 4 more | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| There is a use-after-free issue in all samba 4.9.x versions before 4.9.18, all samba 4.10.x versions before 4.10.12 and all samba 4.11.x versions before 4.11.5, essentially due to a call to realloc() while other local variables still point at the original buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3870 | 3 Fedoraproject, Samba, Synology | 9 Fedora, Samba, Directory Server and 6 more | 2025-01-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Samba from version (including) 4.9 to versions before 4.9.6 and 4.10.2. During the creation of a new Samba AD DC, files are created in a private subdirectory of the install location. This directory is typically mode 0700, that is owner (root) only access. However in some upgraded installations it will have other permissions, such as 0755, because this was the default before Samba 4.8. Within this directory, files are created with mode 0666, which is world-writable, including a sample krb5.conf, and the list of DNS names and servicePrincipalName values to update. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||