Filtered by vendor Python
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Python
Subscriptions
Total
130 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-2940 | 2 Pygresql, Python | 2 Pygresql, Python | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The pygresql module 3.8.1 and 4.0 for Python does not properly support the PQescapeStringConn function, which might allow remote attackers to leverage escaping issues involving multibyte character encodings. | ||||
| CVE-2009-3720 | 5 A M Kuchling, Apache, Libexpat Project and 2 more | 7 Pyxml, Http Server, Libexpat and 4 more | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The updatePosition function in lib/xmltok_impl.c in libexpat in Expat 2.0.1, as used in Python, PyXML, w3c-libwww, and other software, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via an XML document with crafted UTF-8 sequences that trigger a buffer over-read, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-2625. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0150 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the getaddrinfo function in Python 2.2 before 2.2.2, when IPv6 support is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an IPv6 address that is obtained using DNS. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0089 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Python, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The SimpleXMLRPCServer library module in Python 2.2, 2.3 before 2.3.5, and 2.4, when used by XML-RPC servers that use the register_instance method to register an object without a _dispatch method, allows remote attackers to read or modify globals of the associated module, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via dotted attributes. | ||||
| CVE-2006-1542 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Python, Network Satellite | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Python 2.4.2 and earlier, running on Linux 2.6.12.5 under gcc 4.0.3 with libc 2.3.5, allows local users to cause a "stack overflow," and possibly gain privileges, by running a script from a current working directory that has a long name, related to the realpath function. NOTE: this might not be a vulnerability. However, the fact that it appears in a programming language interpreter could mean that some applications are affected, although attack scenarios might be limited because the attacker might already need to cross privilege boundaries to cause an exploitable program to be placed in a directory with a long name; or, depending on the method that Python uses to determine the current working directory, setuid applications might be affected. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1119 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Linux | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| os._execvpe from os.py in Python 2.2.1 and earlier creates temporary files with predictable names, which could allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a symlink attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6232 | 2 Python, Redhat | 8 Cpython, Python, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2025-03-20 | 7.5 High |
| There is a MEDIUM severity vulnerability affecting CPython. Regular expressions that allowed excessive backtracking during tarfile.TarFile header parsing are vulnerable to ReDoS via specifically-crafted tar archives. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24329 | 4 Fedoraproject, Netapp, Python and 1 more | 14 Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager, Management Services For Element Software and 11 more | 2025-03-18 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in the urllib.parse component of Python before 3.11.4 allows attackers to bypass blocklisting methods by supplying a URL that starts with blank characters. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10735 | 3 Fedoraproject, Python, Redhat | 7 Fedora, Python, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in python. In algorithms with quadratic time complexity using non-binary bases, when using int("text"), a system could take 50ms to parse an int string with 100,000 digits and 5s for 1,000,000 digits (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), and int() for binary bases 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 are not affected). The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7592 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Cpython, Python, Enterprise Linux | 2025-02-05 | 7.5 High |
| There is a LOW severity vulnerability affecting CPython, specifically the 'http.cookies' standard library module. When parsing cookies that contained backslashes for quoted characters in the cookie value, the parser would use an algorithm with quadratic complexity, resulting in excess CPU resources being used while parsing the value. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36632 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2024-11-27 | 7.5 High |
| The legacy email.utils.parseaddr function in Python through 3.11.4 allows attackers to trigger "RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object" via a crafted argument. This argument is plausibly an untrusted value from an application's input data that was supposed to contain a name and an e-mail address. NOTE: email.utils.parseaddr is categorized as a Legacy API in the documentation of the Python email package. Applications should instead use the email.parser.BytesParser or email.parser.Parser class. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is that this is neither a vulnerability nor a bug. The email package is intended to have size limits and to throw an exception when limits are exceeded; they were exceeded by the example demonstration code. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6507 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was found in CPython 3.12.0 `subprocess` module on POSIX platforms. The issue was fixed in CPython 3.12.1 and does not affect other stable releases. When using the `extra_groups=` parameter with an empty list as a value (ie `extra_groups=[]`) the logic regressed to not call `setgroups(0, NULL)` before calling `exec()`, thus not dropping the original processes' groups before starting the new process. There is no issue when the parameter isn't used or when any value is used besides an empty list. This issue only impacts CPython processes run with sufficient privilege to make the `setgroups` system call (typically `root`). | ||||
| CVE-2023-41105 | 3 Netapp, Python, Redhat | 3 Active Iq Unified Manager, Python, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Python 3.11 through 3.11.4. If a path containing '\0' bytes is passed to os.path.normpath(), the path will be truncated unexpectedly at the first '\0' byte. There are plausible cases in which an application would have rejected a filename for security reasons in Python 3.10.x or earlier, but that filename is no longer rejected in Python 3.11.x. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40217 | 2 Python, Redhat | 8 Python, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Python before 3.8.18, 3.9.x before 3.9.18, 3.10.x before 3.10.13, and 3.11.x before 3.11.5. It primarily affects servers (such as HTTP servers) that use TLS client authentication. If a TLS server-side socket is created, receives data into the socket buffer, and then is closed quickly, there is a brief window where the SSLSocket instance will detect the socket as "not connected" and won't initiate a handshake, but buffered data will still be readable from the socket buffer. This data will not be authenticated if the server-side TLS peer is expecting client certificate authentication, and is indistinguishable from valid TLS stream data. Data is limited in size to the amount that will fit in the buffer. (The TLS connection cannot directly be used for data exfiltration because the vulnerable code path requires that the connection be closed on initialization of the SSLSocket.) | ||||
| CVE-2023-38898 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue in Python cpython v.3.7 allows an attacker to obtain sensitive information via the _asyncio._swap_current_task component. NOTE: this is disputed by the vendor because (1) neither 3.7 nor any other release is affected (it is a bug in some 3.12 pre-releases); (2) there are no common scenarios in which an adversary can call _asyncio._swap_current_task but does not already have the ability to call arbitrary functions; and (3) there are no common scenarios in which sensitive information, which is not already accessible to an adversary, becomes accessible through this bug. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33595 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| CPython v3.12.0 alpha 7 was discovered to contain a heap use-after-free via the function ascii_decode at /Objects/unicodeobject.c. | ||||
| CVE-2023-27043 | 2 Python, Redhat | 4 Python, Enterprise Linux, Openshift Data Foundation and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| The email module of Python through 3.11.3 incorrectly parses e-mail addresses that contain a special character. The wrong portion of an RFC2822 header is identified as the value of the addr-spec. In some applications, an attacker can bypass a protection mechanism in which application access is granted only after verifying receipt of e-mail to a specific domain (e.g., only @company.example.com addresses may be used for signup). This occurs in email/_parseaddr.py in recent versions of Python. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48566 | 3 Debian, Netapp, Python | 4 Debian Linux, Active Iq Unified Manager, Converged Systems Advisor Agent and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in compare_digest in Lib/hmac.py in Python through 3.9.1. Constant-time-defeating optimisations were possible in the accumulator variable in hmac.compare_digest. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48565 | 3 Debian, Python, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Python, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An XML External Entity (XXE) issue was discovered in Python through 3.9.1. The plistlib module no longer accepts entity declarations in XML plist files to avoid XML vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48564 | 3 Netapp, Python, Redhat | 4 Active Iq Unified Manager, Python, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| read_ints in plistlib.py in Python through 3.9.1 is vulnerable to a potential DoS attack via CPU and RAM exhaustion when processing malformed Apple Property List files in binary format. | ||||