Total
1196 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-26493 | 1 Drupal | 1 Saml Sp 2.0 Single Sign On | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Xecurify's miniOrange Premium, Standard, and Enterprise Drupal SAML SP modules possess an authentication and authorization bypass vulnerability. An attacker with access to a HTTP-request intercepting method is able to bypass authentication and authorization by removing the SAML Assertion Signature - impersonating existing users and existing roles, including administrative users/roles. This vulnerability is not mitigated by configuring the module to enforce signatures or certificate checks. Xecurify recommends updating miniOrange modules to their most recent versions. This vulnerability is present in paid versions of the miniOrange Drupal SAML SP product affecting Drupal 7, 8, and 9. | ||||
| CVE-2022-26491 | 2 Debian, Pidgin | 2 Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Pidgin before 2.14.9. A remote attacker who can spoof DNS responses can redirect a client connection to a malicious server. The client will perform TLS certificate verification of the malicious domain name instead of the original XMPP service domain, allowing the attacker to take over control over the XMPP connection and to obtain user credentials and all communication content. This is similar to CVE-2022-24968. | ||||
| CVE-2022-26305 | 2 Libreoffice, Redhat | 2 Libreoffice, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice existed where determining if a macro was signed by a trusted author was done by only matching the serial number and issuer string of the used certificate with that of a trusted certificate. This is not sufficient to verify that the macro was actually signed with the certificate. An adversary could therefore create an arbitrary certificate with a serial number and an issuer string identical to a trusted certificate which LibreOffice would present as belonging to the trusted author, potentially leading to the user to execute arbitrary code contained in macros improperly trusted. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.7; 7.3 versions prior to 7.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25640 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25638 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, certificate validation may be bypassed during attempted authentication by a TLS 1.3 client to a TLS 1.3 server. This occurs when the sig_algo field differs between the certificate_verify message and the certificate message. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25243 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Vault | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| "Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.8.0 through 1.8.8, and 1.9.3 allowed the PKI secrets engine under certain configurations to issue wildcard certificates to authorized users for a specified domain, even if the PKI role policy attribute allow_subdomains is set to false. Fixed in Vault Enterprise 1.8.9 and 1.9.4. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24968 | 1 Mellium | 1 Xmpp | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| In Mellium mellium.im/xmpp through 0.21.0, an attacker capable of spoofing DNS TXT records can redirect a WebSocket connection request to a server under their control without causing TLS certificate verification to fail. This occurs because the wrong host name is selected during this verification. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24320 | 1 Schneider-electric | 3 Clearscada, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2019, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2020 | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA database server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions) | ||||
| CVE-2022-24319 | 1 Schneider-electric | 3 Clearscada, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2019, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2020 | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA web server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions) | ||||
| CVE-2022-22946 | 2 Oracle, Vmware | 6 Commerce Guided Search, Communications Cloud Native Core Binding Support Function, Communications Cloud Native Core Console and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ , applications that are configured to enable HTTP2 and no key store or trusted certificates are set will be configured to use an insecure TrustManager. This makes the gateway able to connect to remote services with invalid or custom certificates. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22885 | 1 Hutool | 1 Hutool | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Hutool v5.7.18's HttpRequest was discovered to ignore all TLS/SSL certificate validation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22787 | 1 Zoom | 1 Meetings | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| The Zoom Client for Meetings (for Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, and Windows) before version 5.10.0 fails to properly validate the hostname during a server switch request. This issue could be used in a more sophisticated attack to trick an unsuspecting users client to connect to a malicious server when attempting to use Zoom services. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22576 | 6 Brocade, Debian, Haxx and 3 more | 18 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Curl and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| An improper authentication vulnerability exists in curl 7.33.0 to and including 7.82.0 which might allow reuse OAUTH2-authenticated connections without properly making sure that the connection was authenticated with the same credentials as set for this transfer. This affects SASL-enabled protocols: SMPTP(S), IMAP(S), POP3(S) and LDAP(S) (openldap only). | ||||
| CVE-2022-22549 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, 8.2.x-9.3.x, contains a Improper Certificate Validation. A unauthenticated remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a man-in-the-middle capture of administrative credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22380 | 3 Apple, Ibm, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Security Verify Privilege On-premises, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 5 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity due to improperly validating certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 221957. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22306 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.10, 6.4.0 through 6.4.8, 7.0.0 may allow a network adjacent and unauthenticated attacker to man-in-the-middle the communication between the FortiGate and some peers such as private SDNs and external cloud platforms. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22305 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager, Fortios and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiManager 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below; FortiAnalyzer 7.0.2 and below, 6.4.7 and below; FortiOS 6.2.x and 6.0.x; FortiSandbox 4.0.x, 3.2.x and 3.1.x may allow a network adjacent and unauthenticated attacker to man-in-the-middle the communication between the listed products and some external peers. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22156 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| An Improper Certificate Validation weakness in the Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to perform Person-in-the-Middle (PitM) attacks when a system script is fetched from a remote source at a specified HTTPS URL, which may compromise the integrity and confidentiality of the device. The following command can be executed by an administrator via the CLI to refresh a script from a remote location, which is affected from this vulnerability: >request system scripts refresh-from (commit | event | extension-service | op | snmp) file filename url <https-url> This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS All versions prior to 18.4R2-S9, 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2-S3, 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2-S2, 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R2; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R1-S1, 21.1R2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21170 | 1 Daj | 6 Dspa-15000 M5, Dspa-2000 M4, Dspa-4000 M4 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.7 Low |
| Improper check for certificate revocation in i-FILTER Ver.10.45R01 and earlier, i-FILTER Ver.9.50R10 and earlier, i-FILTER Browser & Cloud MultiAgent for Windows Ver.4.93R04 and earlier, and D-SPA (Ver.3 / Ver.4) using i-FILTER allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on an encrypted communication. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20960 | 1 Cisco | 1 Email Security Appliance | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of certain TLS connections that are processed by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing a large number of concurrent TLS connections to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to drop new TLS email messages that come from the associated email servers. Exploitation of this vulnerability does not cause the affected device to unexpectedly reload. The device will recover autonomously within a few hours of when the attack is halted or mitigated. | ||||