Total
155 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-8804 | 4 Canonical, Nettle Project, Opensuse and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Nettle, Leap and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| x86_64/ecc-384-modp.asm in Nettle before 3.2 does not properly handle carry propagation and produces incorrect output in its implementation of the P-384 NIST elliptic curve, which allows attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7546 | 2 Openstack, Oracle | 3 Keystone, Keystonemiddleware, Solaris | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The identity service in OpenStack Identity (Keystone) before 2015.1.3 (Kilo) and 8.0.x before 8.0.2 (Liberty) and keystonemiddleware (formerly python-keystoneclient) before 1.5.4 (Kilo) and Liberty before 2.3.3 does not properly invalidate authorization tokens when using the PKI or PKIZ token providers, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and gain access to cloud resources by manipulating byte fields within a revoked token. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7940 | 4 Bouncycastle, Opensuse, Oracle and 1 more | 9 Bouncy Castle Crypto Package, Leap, Opensuse and 6 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." | ||||
| CVE-2015-7184 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The fetch API implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 41.0.2 does not restrict access to the HTTP response body in certain situations where user credentials are supplied but the CORS cross-origin request algorithm is improperly followed, which allows remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy via a crafted web site. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0107 | 3 Apache, Oracle, Redhat | 15 Xalan-java, Webcenter Sites, Enterprise Linux and 12 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The TransformerFactory in Apache Xalan-Java before 2.7.2 does not properly restrict access to certain properties when FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING is enabled, which allows remote attackers to bypass expected restrictions and load arbitrary classes or access external resources via a crafted (1) xalan:content-header, (2) xalan:entities, (3) xslt:content-header, or (4) xslt:entities property, or a Java property that is bound to the XSLT 1.0 system-property function. | ||||
| CVE-2014-1491 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 15 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 12 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.15.4, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 27.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.3, Thunderbird before 24.3, SeaMonkey before 2.24, and other products, does not properly restrict public values in Diffie-Hellman key exchanges, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms in ticket handling by leveraging use of a certain value. | ||||
| CVE-2021-26328 | 1 Amd | 48 Epyc 7003, Epyc 7003 Firmware, Epyc 72f3 and 45 more | 2025-04-09 | 4.4 Medium |
| Failure to verify the mode of CPU execution at the time of SNP_INIT may lead to a potential loss of memory integrity for SNP guests. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22393 | 1 Juniper | 2 Junos, Junos Os Evolved | 2025-04-07 | 7.5 High |
| An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in BGP route processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an attacker to cause Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) crash by sending a BGP route with invalid next-hop resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue only affects systems without import policy configured. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2-S2, 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S1, 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R2-S2-EVO, 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R1-S1-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 21.1R1. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions prior to 21.3R1-EVO. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3069 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-04-07 | 8.8 High |
| Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 135.0.7049.52 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2023-30456 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 4 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2025-03-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c in the Linux kernel before 6.2.8. nVMX on x86_64 lacks consistency checks for CR0 and CR4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21267 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2025-03-12 | 4.4 Medium |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-25152 | 1 Itarian | 2 On-premise, Saas Service Desk | 2025-03-11 | 9.9 Critical |
| The ITarian platform (SAAS / on-premise) offers the possibility to run code on agents via a function called procedures. It is possible to require a mandatory approval process. Due to a vulnerability in the approval process, present in any version prior to 6.35.37347.20040, a malicious actor (with a valid session token) can create a procedure, bypass approval, and execute the procedure. This results in the ability for any user with a valid session token to perform arbitrary code execution and full system take-over on all agents. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28113 | 1 Russh Project | 1 Russh | 2025-02-25 | 5.9 Medium |
| russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Starting in version 0.34.0 and prior to versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1, Diffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality. Connections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping. Most other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case. This issue is fixed in versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1 | ||||
| CVE-2024-6101 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 126.0.6478.114 allowed a remote attacker to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2024-3845 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Inappropriate implementation in Networks in Google Chrome prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed a remote attacker to bypass mixed content policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2024-3844 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2025-02-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2024-3838 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-02-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Autofill in Google Chrome prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious app to perform UI spoofing via a crafted app. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2024-27842 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2025-02-13 | 8.1 High |
| The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.5. An app may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2174 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 122.0.6261.111 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2023-4039 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gcc | 2025-02-13 | 4.8 Medium |
| **DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself. | ||||