Total
599 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-3114 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Terraform Enterprise | 2024-12-04 | 5 Medium |
| Terraform Enterprise since v202207-1 did not properly implement authorization rules for agent pools, allowing the workspace to be targeted by unauthorized agents. This authorization flaw could potentially allow a workspace to access resources from a separate, higher-privileged workspace in the same organization that targeted an agent pool. This vulnerability, CVE-2023-3114, is fixed in Terraform Enterprise v202306-1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11860 | 2 Mayurik, Sourcecodester | 2 Best House Rental Management System, Best House Rental Management System | 2024-12-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in SourceCodester Best House Rental Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /rental/ajax.php?action=delete_tenant of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument id leads to improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11484 | 1 Code4berry | 1 Decoration Management System | 2024-12-02 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Code4Berry Decoration Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /decoration/admin/update_image.php of the component User Image Handler. The manipulation of the argument productimage1 leads to improper access controls. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11485 | 1 Code4berry | 1 Decoration Management System | 2024-12-02 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Code4Berry Decoration Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /decoration/admin/userregister.php of the component User Handler. The manipulation leads to permission issues. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11486 | 1 Code4berry | 1 Decoration Management System | 2024-12-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Code4Berry Decoration Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /decoration/admin/user_permission.php of the component User Permission Handler. The manipulation leads to permission issues. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39576 | 1 Dell | 1 Power Manager | 2024-11-26 | 8.8 High |
| Dell Power Manager (DPM), versions 3.15.0 and prior, contains an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution and Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45759 | 1 Dell | 1 Data Domain Operating System | 2024-11-26 | 6.8 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions prior to 8.1.0.0, 7.13.1.10, 7.10.1.40, and 7.7.5.50, contains an escalation of privilege vulnerability. A local low privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized execution of certain commands to overwrite system config of the application. Exploitation may lead to denial of service of system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9476 | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Grafana Labs Grafana OSS and Enterprise allows Privilege Escalation allows users to gain access to resources from other organizations within the same Grafana instance via the Grafana Cloud Migration Assistant.This vulnerability will only affect users who utilize the Organizations feature to isolate resources on their Grafana instance. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52442 | 1 Userplus | 1 Userplus | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Userplus UserPlus allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects UserPlus: from n/a through 2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37293 | 2 Amazon, Awslabs | 2 Aws Deployment Framework, Aws-deployment-framework | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 High |
| The AWS Deployment Framework (ADF) is a framework to manage and deploy resources across multiple AWS accounts and regions within an AWS Organization. ADF allows for staged, parallel, multi-account, cross-region deployments of applications or resources via the structure defined in AWS Organizations while taking advantage of services such as AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeCommit to alleviate the heavy lifting and management compared to a traditional CI/CD setup. ADF contains a bootstrap process that is responsible to deploy ADF's bootstrap stacks to facilitate multi-account cross-region deployments. The ADF bootstrap process relies on elevated privileges to perform this task. Two versions of the bootstrap process exist; a code-change driven pipeline using AWS CodeBuild and an event-driven state machine using AWS Lambda. If an actor has permissions to change the behavior of the CodeBuild project or the Lambda function, they would be able to escalate their privileges. Prior to version 4.0.0, the bootstrap CodeBuild role provides access to the `sts:AssumeRole` operation without further restrictions. Therefore, it is able to assume into any AWS Account in the AWS Organization with the elevated privileges provided by the cross-account access role. By default, this role is not restricted when it is created by AWS Organizations, providing Administrator level access to the AWS resources in the AWS Account. The patches for this issue are included in `aws-deployment-framework` version 4.0.0. As a temporary mitigation, add a permissions boundary to the roles created by ADF in the management account. The permissions boundary should deny all IAM and STS actions. This permissions boundary should be in place until you upgrade ADF or bootstrap a new account. While the permissions boundary is in place, the account management and bootstrapping of accounts are unable to create, update, or assume into roles. This mitigates the privilege escalation risk, but also disables ADF's ability to create, manage, and bootstrap accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37134 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain root-level access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37132 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service and Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36587 | 1 Dnscrypt | 1 Dnscrypt-proxy | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Insecure permissions in DNSCrypt-proxy v2.0.0alpha9 to v2.1.5 allows non-privileged attackers to escalate privileges to root via overwriting the binary dnscrypt-proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31912 | 1 Ibm | 2 Mq, Mq Appliance | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM MQ 9.3 LTS and 9.3 CD could allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges under certain configurations due to incorrect privilege assignment. IBM X-Force ID: 289894. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27460 | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A privilege escalation exists in the updater for Plantronics Hub 3.25.1 and below. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23794 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2024-11-21 | 5.2 Medium |
| An incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in the inline editing functionality of OTRS can lead to privilege escalation. This flaw allows an agent with read-only permissions to gain full access to a ticket. This issue arises in very rare instances when an admin has previously enabled the setting 'RequiredLock' of 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' in the system configuration.This issue affects OTRS: * 8.0.X * 2023.X * from 2024.X through 2024.4.x | ||||
| CVE-2024-0085 | 6 Canonical, Citrix, Microsoft and 3 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Hypervisor, Azure Stack Hci and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.3 Medium |
| NVIDIA vGPU software for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where unprivileged users could execute privileged operations on the host. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to data tampering, escalation of privileges, and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6815 | 1 Mitsubishielectric | 16 R08psfcpu, R08psfcpu Firmware, R08sfcpu and 13 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series Safety CPU R08/16/32/120SFCPU all versions and MELSEC iQ-R Series SIL2 Process CPU R08/16/32/120PSFCPU all versions allows a remote authenticated attacker who has logged into the product as a non-administrator user to disclose the credentials (user ID and password) of a user with a lower access level than the attacker by sending a specially crafted packet. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5913 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Fortify Scancentral Dast | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in opentext Fortify ScanCentral DAST. The vulnerability could be exploited to gain elevated privileges.This issue affects Fortify ScanCentral DAST versions 21.1, 21.2, 21.2.1, 22.1, 22.1.1, 22.2, 23.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5077 | 2 Hashicorp, Redhat | 3 Vault, Openshift, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 High |
| The Vault and Vault Enterprise ("Vault") Google Cloud secrets engine did not preserve existing Google Cloud IAM Conditions upon creating or updating rolesets. Fixed in Vault 1.13.0. | ||||