Total
678 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-20251 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 Low |
| In LocaleManager, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-225881167 | ||||
| CVE-2022-20249 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 Low |
| In LocaleManager, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-226900861 | ||||
| CVE-2022-20242 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| In Telephony, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-231986212 | ||||
| CVE-2022-1989 | 1 Codesys | 1 Visualization | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| All CODESYS Visualization versions before V4.2.0.0 generate a login dialog vulnerable to information exposure allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to enumerate valid users. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1146 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Resource Timing in Google Chrome prior to 100.0.4896.60 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1139 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Background Fetch API in Google Chrome prior to 100.0.4896.60 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0823 | 1 Zyxel | 8 Gs1200-5, Gs1200-5 Firmware, Gs1200-5hp and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.2 Medium |
| An improper control of interaction frequency vulnerability in Zyxel GS1200 series switches could allow a local attacker to guess the password by using a timing side-channel attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-0569 | 1 Snipeitapp | 1 Snipe-it | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Observable Discrepancy in Packagist snipe/snipe-it prior to v5.3.9. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4294 | 1 Redhat | 3 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Osin | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in OpenShift OSIN. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function ClientSecretMatches/CheckClientSecret. The manipulation of the argument secret leads to observable timing discrepancy. The name of the patch is 8612686d6dda34ae9ef6b5a974e4b7accb4fea29. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216987. | ||||
| CVE-2021-46778 | 1 Amd | 358 Athlon 3050ge, Athlon 3050ge Firmware, Athlon 3150g and 355 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.6 Medium |
| Execution unit scheduler contention may lead to a side channel vulnerability found on AMD CPU microarchitectures codenamed “Zen 1”, “Zen 2” and “Zen 3” that use simultaneous multithreading (SMT). By measuring the contention level on scheduler queues an attacker may potentially leak sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2021-46744 | 1 Amd | 198 Epyc 7001, Epyc 7001 Firmware, Epyc 7002 and 195 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| An attacker with access to a malicious hypervisor may be able to infer data values used in a SEV guest on AMD CPUs by monitoring ciphertext values over time. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45901 | 1 Servicenow | 1 Servicenow | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| The password-reset form in ServiceNow Orlando provides different responses to invalid authentication attempts depending on whether the username exists. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44876 | 1 Dalmark | 1 Systeam Enterprise Resource Planning | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Dalmark Systems Systeam 2.22.8 build 1724 is vulnerable to User enumeration. The Systeam application is an ERP system that uses a mixed architecture based on SaaS tenant and user management, and on-premise database and web application counterparts. This issue occurs during the identification of the correct tenant for a given user, where a difference in messages could allow an attacker to determine if the given user is valid or not, enabling a brute force attack with valid users. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44875 | 1 Dalmark | 1 Systeam Enterprise Resource Planning | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Dalmark Systems Systeam 2.22.8 build 1724 is vulnerable to User enumeration. The Systeam application is an ERP system that uses a mixed architecture based on SaaS tenant and user management, and on-premise database and web application counterparts. This issue occurs during the password recovery procedure for a given user, where a difference in messages could allow an attacker to determine if the given user is valid or not, enabling a brute force attack with valid users. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44848 | 1 Cybelesoft | 1 Thinfinity Virtualui | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Cibele Thinfinity VirtualUI before 3.0, /changePassword returns different responses for invalid authentication requests depending on whether the username exists. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44554 | 1 Cybelesoft | 1 Thinfinity Virtualui | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Thinfinity VirtualUI before 3.0 allows a malicious actor to enumerate users registered in the OS (Windows) through the /changePassword URI. By accessing the vector, an attacker can determine if a username exists thanks to the message returned; it can be presented in different languages according to the configuration of VirtualUI. Common users are administrator, admin, guest and krgtbt. | ||||
| CVE-2021-44421 | 1 Occlum Project | 1 Occlum | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| The pointer-validation logic in util/mem_util.rs in Occlum before 0.26.0 for Intel SGX acts as a confused deputy that allows a local attacker to access unauthorized information via side-channel analysis. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43823 | 1 Sourcegraph | 1 Sourcegraph | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Sourcegraph is a code search and navigation engine. Sourcegraph prior to version 3.33.2 is vulnerable to a side-channel attack where strings in private source code could be guessed by an authenticated but unauthorized actor. This issue affects the Saved Searches and Code Monitoring features. A successful attack would require an authenticated bad actor to create many Saved Searches or Code Monitors to receive confirmation that a specific string exists. This could allow an attacker to guess formatted tokens in source code, such as API keys. This issue was patched in version 3.33.2 and any future versions of Sourcegraph. We strongly encourage upgrading to secure versions. If you are unable to, you may disable Saved Searches and Code Monitors. | ||||
| CVE-2021-43398 | 1 Cryptopp | 1 Crypto\+\+ | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Crypto++ (aka Cryptopp) 8.6.0 and earlier contains a timing leakage in MakePublicKey(). There is a clear correlation between execution time and private key length, which may cause disclosure of the length information of the private key. This might allow attackers to conduct timing attacks. NOTE: this report is disputed by the vendor and multiple third parties. The execution-time differences are intentional. A user may make a choice of a longer key as a tradeoff between strength and performance. In making this choice, the amount of information leaked to an adversary is of infinitesimal value | ||||
| CVE-2021-42016 | 1 Siemens | 54 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 51 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A timing attack, in a third-party component, could make the retrieval of the private key possible, used for encryption of sensitive data. If a threat actor were to exploit this, the data integrity and security could be compromised. | ||||