Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Ceph Storage
Subscriptions
Total
156 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-21673 | 3 Fedoraproject, Grafana, Redhat | 5 Fedora, Grafana, Ceph Storage and 2 more | 2025-04-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. In affected versions when a data source has the Forward OAuth Identity feature enabled, sending a query to that datasource with an API token (and no other user credentials) will forward the OAuth Identity of the most recently logged-in user. This can allow API token holders to retrieve data for which they may not have intended access. This attack relies on the Grafana instance having data sources that support the Forward OAuth Identity feature, the Grafana instance having a data source with the Forward OAuth Identity feature toggled on, the Grafana instance having OAuth enabled, and the Grafana instance having usable API keys. This issue has been patched in versions 7.5.13 and 8.3.4. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31097 | 3 Grafana, Netapp, Redhat | 3 Grafana, E-series Performance Analyzer, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-23 | 7.3 High |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Versions on the 8.x and 9.x branch prior to 9.0.3, 8.5.9, 8.4.10, and 8.3.10 are vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting via the Unified Alerting feature of Grafana. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to escalate privilege from editor to admin by tricking an authenticated admin to click on a link. Versions 9.0.3, 8.5.9, 8.4.10, and 8.3.10 contain a patch. As a workaround, it is possible to disable alerting or use legacy alerting. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31107 | 3 Grafana, Netapp, Redhat | 6 Grafana, E-series Performance Analyzer, Ceph Storage and 3 more | 2025-04-23 | 7.1 High |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. In versions 5.3 until 9.0.3, 8.5.9, 8.4.10, and 8.3.10, it is possible for a malicious user who has authorization to log into a Grafana instance via a configured OAuth IdP which provides a login name to take over the account of another user in that Grafana instance. This can occur when the malicious user is authorized to log in to Grafana via OAuth, the malicious user's external user id is not already associated with an account in Grafana, the malicious user's email address is not already associated with an account in Grafana, and the malicious user knows the Grafana username of the target user. If these conditions are met, the malicious user can set their username in the OAuth provider to that of the target user, then go through the OAuth flow to log in to Grafana. Due to the way that external and internal user accounts are linked together during login, if the conditions above are all met then the malicious user will be able to log in to the target user's Grafana account. Versions 9.0.3, 8.5.9, 8.4.10, and 8.3.10 contain a patch for this issue. As a workaround, concerned users can disable OAuth login to their Grafana instance, or ensure that all users authorized to log in via OAuth have a corresponding user account in Grafana linked to their email address. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35957 | 3 Fedoraproject, Grafana, Redhat | 4 Fedora, Grafana, Ceph Storage and 1 more | 2025-04-23 | 6.6 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Versions prior to 9.1.6 and 8.5.13 are vulnerable to an escalation from admin to server admin when auth proxy is used, allowing an admin to take over the server admin account and gain full control of the grafana instance. All installations should be upgraded as soon as possible. As a workaround deactivate auth proxy following the instructions at: https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/setup-grafana/configure-security/configure-authentication/auth-proxy/ | ||||
| CVE-2022-31123 | 3 Grafana, Netapp, Redhat | 4 Grafana, E-series Performance Analyzer, Ceph Storage and 1 more | 2025-04-23 | 6.1 Medium |
| Grafana is an open source observability and data visualization platform. Versions prior to 9.1.8 and 8.5.14 are vulnerable to a bypass in the plugin signature verification. An attacker can convince a server admin to download and successfully run a malicious plugin even though unsigned plugins are not allowed. Versions 9.1.8 and 8.5.14 contain a patch for this issue. As a workaround, do not install plugins downloaded from untrusted sources. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31130 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-23 | 4.9 Medium |
| Grafana is an open source observability and data visualization platform. Versions of Grafana for endpoints prior to 9.1.8 and 8.5.14 could leak authentication tokens to some destination plugins under some conditions. The vulnerability impacts data source and plugin proxy endpoints with authentication tokens. The destination plugin could receive a user's Grafana authentication token. Versions 9.1.8 and 8.5.14 contain a patch for this issue. As a workaround, do not use API keys, JWT authentication, or any HTTP Header based authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39201 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-23 | 6.8 Medium |
| Grafana is an open source observability and data visualization platform. Starting with version 5.0.0-beta1 and prior to versions 8.5.14 and 9.1.8, Grafana could leak the authentication cookie of users to plugins. The vulnerability impacts data source and plugin proxy endpoints under certain conditions. The destination plugin could receive a user's Grafana authentication cookie. Versions 9.1.8 and 8.5.14 contain a patch for this issue. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39229 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-23 | 4.3 Medium |
| Grafana is an open source data visualization platform for metrics, logs, and traces. Versions prior to 9.1.8 and 8.5.14 allow one user to block another user's login attempt by registering someone else'e email address as a username. A Grafana user’s username and email address are unique fields, that means no other user can have the same username or email address as another user. A user can have an email address as a username. However, the login system allows users to log in with either username or email address. Since Grafana allows a user to log in with either their username or email address, this creates an usual behavior where `user_1` can register with one email address and `user_2` can register their username as `user_1`’s email address. This prevents `user_1` logging into the application since `user_1`'s password won’t match with `user_2`'s email address. Versions 9.1.8 and 8.5.14 contain a patch. There are no workarounds for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39306 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-23 | 6.4 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Versions prior to 9.2.4, or 8.5.15 on the 8.X branch, are subject to Improper Input Validation. Grafana admins can invite other members to the organization they are an admin for. When admins add members to the organization, non existing users get an email invite, existing members are added directly to the organization. When an invite link is sent, it allows users to sign up with whatever username/email address the user chooses and become a member of the organization. This introduces a vulnerability which can be used with malicious intent. This issue is patched in version 9.2.4, and has been backported to 8.5.15. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39307 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-23 | 6.7 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. When using the forget password on the login page, a POST request is made to the `/api/user/password/sent-reset-email` URL. When the username or email does not exist, a JSON response contains a “user not found” message. This leaks information to unauthenticated users and introduces a security risk. This issue has been patched in 9.2.4 and backported to 8.5.15. There are no known workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41912 | 2 Redhat, Saml Project | 4 Acm, Ceph Storage, Openshift and 1 more | 2025-04-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| The crewjam/saml go library prior to version 0.4.9 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass when processing SAML responses containing multiple Assertion elements. This issue has been corrected in version 0.4.9. There are no workarounds other than upgrading to a fixed version. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23491 | 3 Certifi, Netapp, Redhat | 6 Certifi, E-series Performance Analyzer, Management Services For Element Software and 3 more | 2025-04-23 | 6.8 Medium |
| Certifi is a curated collection of Root Certificates for validating the trustworthiness of SSL certificates while verifying the identity of TLS hosts. Certifi 2022.12.07 removes root certificates from "TrustCor" from the root store. These are in the process of being removed from Mozilla's trust store. TrustCor's root certificates are being removed pursuant to an investigation prompted by media reporting that TrustCor's ownership also operated a business that produced spyware. Conclusions of Mozilla's investigation can be found in the linked google group discussion. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21680 | 3 Fedoraproject, Marked Project, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Marked, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| Marked is a markdown parser and compiler. Prior to version 4.0.10, the regular expression `block.def` may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings and lead to a regular expression denial of service (ReDoS). Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through a vulnerable version of marked and does not use a worker with a time limit may be affected. This issue is patched in version 4.0.10. As a workaround, avoid running untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21681 | 3 Fedoraproject, Marked Project, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Marked, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
| Marked is a markdown parser and compiler. Prior to version 4.0.10, the regular expression `inline.reflinkSearch` may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings and lead to a denial of service (DoS). Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through a vulnerable version of marked and does not use a worker with a time limit may be affected. This issue is patched in version 4.0.10. As a workaround, avoid running untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8779 | 4 Libtirpc Project, Ntirpc Project, Redhat and 1 more | 6 Libtirpc, Ntirpc, Ceph Storage and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| rpcbind through 0.2.4, LIBTIRPC through 1.0.1 and 1.0.2-rc through 1.0.2-rc3, and NTIRPC through 1.4.3 do not consider the maximum RPC data size during memory allocation for XDR strings, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption with no subsequent free) via a crafted UDP packet to port 111, aka rpcbomb. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4231 | 2 Angular, Redhat | 2 Angular, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Angular up to 11.0.4/11.1.0-next.2. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is the handling of comments. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely but it might require an authentication first. Upgrading to version 11.0.5 and 11.1.0-next.3 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is ba8da742e3b243e8f43d4c63aa842b44e14f2b09. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5009 | 1 Redhat | 8 Ceph, Ceph Storage, Ceph Storage Mon and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The handle_command function in mon/Monitor.cc in Ceph allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and ceph monitor crash) via an (1) empty or (2) crafted prefix. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3010 | 2 Ceph, Redhat | 2 Ceph-deploy, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| ceph-deploy before 1.5.23 uses weak permissions (644) for ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the file. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5245 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ceph, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the Ceph Object Gateway (aka radosgw or RGW) in Ceph before 0.94.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted bucket name. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3583 | 4 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 1 more | 6 Http Server, Mac Os X, Os X Server and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The handle_headers function in mod_proxy_fcgi.c in the mod_proxy_fcgi module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.4.10 allows remote FastCGI servers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and daemon crash) via long response headers. | ||||