Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Ceph Storage
Subscriptions
Total
140 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-3583 | 4 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 1 more | 6 Http Server, Mac Os X, Os X Server and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The handle_headers function in mod_proxy_fcgi.c in the mod_proxy_fcgi module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.4.10 allows remote FastCGI servers to cause a denial of service (buffer over-read and daemon crash) via long response headers. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7031 | 2 Ceph Project, Redhat | 2 Ceph, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The RGW code in Ceph before 10.0.1, when authenticated-read ACL is applied to a bucket, allows remote attackers to list the bucket contents via a URL. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5009 | 1 Redhat | 8 Ceph, Ceph Storage, Ceph Storage Mon and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The handle_command function in mon/Monitor.cc in Ceph allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and ceph monitor crash) via an (1) empty or (2) crafted prefix. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3010 | 2 Ceph, Redhat | 2 Ceph-deploy, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| ceph-deploy before 1.5.23 uses weak permissions (644) for ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the file. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5245 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ceph, Ceph Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the Ceph Object Gateway (aka radosgw or RGW) in Ceph before 0.94.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via a crafted bucket name. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 32 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 29 more | 364 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 361 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25725 | 3 Debian, Haproxy, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Haproxy, Ceph Storage and 3 more | 2025-03-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| HAProxy before 2.7.3 may allow a bypass of access control because HTTP/1 headers are inadvertently lost in some situations, aka "request smuggling." The HTTP header parsers in HAProxy may accept empty header field names, which could be used to truncate the list of HTTP headers and thus make some headers disappear after being parsed and processed for HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1. For HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, the impact is limited because the headers disappear before being parsed and processed, as if they had not been sent by the client. The fixed versions are 2.7.3, 2.6.9, 2.5.12, 2.4.22, 2.2.29, and 2.0.31. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1442 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Acm, Ceph Storage | 2025-03-11 | 6 Medium |
| A user with the permissions to create a data source can use Grafana API to create a data source with UID set to *. Doing this will grant the user access to read, query, edit and delete all data sources within the organization. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23934 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 3 Werkzeug, Ceph Storage, Openstack | 2025-03-10 | 2.6 Low |
| Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. Browsers may allow "nameless" cookies that look like `=value` instead of `key=value`. A vulnerable browser may allow a compromised application on an adjacent subdomain to exploit this to set a cookie like `=__Host-test=bad` for another subdomain. Werkzeug prior to 2.2.3 will parse the cookie `=__Host-test=bad` as __Host-test=bad`. If a Werkzeug application is running next to a vulnerable or malicious subdomain which sets such a cookie using a vulnerable browser, the Werkzeug application will see the bad cookie value but the valid cookie key. The issue is fixed in Werkzeug 2.2.3. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25577 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 6 Werkzeug, Ceph Storage, Openshift and 3 more | 2025-03-10 | 7.5 High |
| Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. Prior to version 2.2.3, Werkzeug's multipart form data parser will parse an unlimited number of parts, including file parts. Parts can be a small amount of bytes, but each requires CPU time to parse and may use more memory as Python data. If a request can be made to an endpoint that accesses `request.data`, `request.form`, `request.files`, or `request.get_data(parse_form_data=False)`, it can cause unexpectedly high resource usage. This allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by sending crafted multipart data to an endpoint that will parse it. The amount of CPU time required can block worker processes from handling legitimate requests. The amount of RAM required can trigger an out of memory kill of the process. Unlimited file parts can use up memory and file handles. If many concurrent requests are sent continuously, this can exhaust or kill all available workers. Version 2.2.3 contains a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0594 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-03-07 | 7.3 High |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Starting with the 7.0 branch, Grafana had a stored XSS vulnerability in the trace view visualization. The stored XSS vulnerability was possible due the value of a span's attributes/resources were not properly sanitized and this will be rendered when the span's attributes/resources are expanded. An attacker needs to have the Editor role in order to change the value of a trace view visualization to contain JavaScript. This means that vertical privilege escalation is possible, where a user with Editor role can change to a known password for a user having Admin role if the user with Admin role executes malicious JavaScript viewing a dashboard. Users may upgrade to version 8.5.21, 9.2.13 and 9.3.8 to receive a fix. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0507 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-03-07 | 7.3 High |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Starting with the 8.1 branch, Grafana had a stored XSS vulnerability affecting the core plugin GeoMap. The stored XSS vulnerability was possible due to map attributions weren't properly sanitized and allowed arbitrary JavaScript to be executed in the context of the currently authorized user of the Grafana instance. An attacker needs to have the Editor role in order to change a panel to include a map attribution containing JavaScript. This means that vertical privilege escalation is possible, where a user with Editor role can change to a known password for a user having Admin role if the user with Admin role executes malicious JavaScript viewing a dashboard. Users may upgrade to version 8.5.21, 9.2.13 and 9.3.8 to receive a fix. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3854 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ceph Storage | 2025-03-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Ceph, relating to the URL processing on RGW backends. An attacker can exploit the URL processing by providing a null URL to crash the RGW, causing a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23498 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-03-05 | 7.1 High |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. When datasource query caching is enabled, Grafana caches all headers, including `grafana_session`. As a result, any user that queries a datasource where the caching is enabled can acquire another user’s session. To mitigate the vulnerability you can disable datasource query caching for all datasources. This issue has been patched in versions 9.2.10 and 9.3.4. | ||||
| CVE-2023-1410 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2025-03-04 | 6.2 Medium |
| Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. Grafana had a stored XSS vulnerability in the Graphite FunctionDescription tooltip. The stored XSS vulnerability was possible due the value of the Function Description was not properly sanitized. An attacker needs to have control over the Graphite data source in order to manipulate a function description and a Grafana admin needs to configure the data source, later a Grafana user needs to select a tampered function and hover over the description. Users may upgrade to version 8.5.22, 9.2.15 and 9.3.11 to receive a fix. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0056 | 3 Fedoraproject, Haproxy, Redhat | 12 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Haproxy and 9 more | 2025-02-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| An uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability was discovered in HAProxy which could crash the service. This issue could allow an authenticated remote attacker to run a specially crafted malicious server in an OpenShift cluster. The biggest impact is to availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22866 | 1 Redhat | 5 Acm, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-02-21 | 4 Medium |
| Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recovery of the private key when P-256 is used in any well known protocols. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45336 | 1 Redhat | 7 Acm, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2025-02-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| The HTTP client drops sensitive headers after following a cross-domain redirect. For example, a request to a.com/ containing an Authorization header which is redirected to b.com/ will not send that header to b.com. In the event that the client received a subsequent same-domain redirect, however, the sensitive headers would be restored. For example, a chain of redirects from a.com/, to b.com/1, and finally to b.com/2 would incorrectly send the Authorization header to b.com/2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34069 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 5 Werkzeug, Ceph Storage, Openshift and 2 more | 2025-02-21 | 7.5 High |
| Werkzeug is a comprehensive WSGI web application library. The debugger in affected versions of Werkzeug can allow an attacker to execute code on a developer's machine under some circumstances. This requires the attacker to get the developer to interact with a domain and subdomain they control, and enter the debugger PIN, but if they are successful it allows access to the debugger even if it is only running on localhost. This also requires the attacker to guess a URL in the developer's application that will trigger the debugger. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22195 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 9 Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform, Ceph Storage and 6 more | 2025-02-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Special placeholders in the template allow writing code similar to Python syntax. It is possible to inject arbitrary HTML attributes into the rendered HTML template, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The Jinja `xmlattr` filter can be abused to inject arbitrary HTML attribute keys and values, bypassing the auto escaping mechanism and potentially leading to XSS. It may also be possible to bypass attribute validation checks if they are blacklist-based. | ||||