Total
8385 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-44293 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2025-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| A privacy issue was addressed with improved private data redaction for log entries. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.1. A user may be able to view sensitive user information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28141 | 2025-11-03 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| The web application is not protected against cross-site request forgery attacks. Therefore, an attacker can trick users into performing actions on the application when they visit an attacker-controlled website or click on a malicious link. E.g. an attacker can forge malicious links to reset the admin password or create new users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31205 | 2 Apple, Redhat | 13 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 10 more | 2025-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in watchOS 11.5, tvOS 18.5, iOS 18.5 and iPadOS 18.5, macOS Sequoia 15.5, visionOS 2.5, Safari 18.5. A malicious website may exfiltrate data cross-origin. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24223 | 2 Apple, Redhat | 12 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 9 more | 2025-11-03 | 8 High |
| The issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in watchOS 11.5, tvOS 18.5, iOS 18.5 and iPadOS 18.5, macOS Sequoia 15.5, visionOS 2.5, Safari 18.5. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54969 | 1 Baesystems | 1 Socet Gxp | 2025-10-31 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in BAE SOCET GXP before 4.6.0.2. The SOCET GXP Job Status Service does not implement CSRF protections. An attacker who social engineers a valid user into clicking a malicious link or visiting a malicious website may be able to submit requests to the Job Status Service without the user's knowledge. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8223 | 1 Jerryshensjf | 1 Jpacookieshop | 2025-10-31 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in jerryshensjf JPACookieShop 蛋糕商城JPA版 up to 24a15c02b4f75042c9f7f615a3fed2ec1cefb999. This affects an unknown part of the file AdminTypeCustController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10317 | 1 Opensolution | 1 Quick.cart | 2025-10-31 | N/A |
| Quick.Cart is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in product creation functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the admin, will automatically send a POST request creating a malicious product with content defined by the attacker. This software does not implement any protection against this type of attack. All forms available in this software are potentially vulnerable. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.7 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7330 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 2 1783-natr, 1783-natr Firmware | 2025-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| A cross-site request forgery security issue exists in the product and version listed. The vulnerability stems from missing CSRF checks on the impacted form. This allows for unintended configuration modification if an attacker can convince a logged in admin to visit a crafted link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34133 | 1 Wimi Teamwork | 1 Wimi Teamwork | 2025-10-30 | N/A |
| Wimi Teamwork versions prior to 7.38.17 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in its API. The API accepts any authenticated request that contains a JSON field named 'csrf_token' without validating the field’s value; only the presence of the field is checked. An attacker can craft a cross-site request that causes a logged-in victim’s browser to submit a JSON POST containing an arbitrary or empty 'csrf_token', and the API will execute the request with the victim’s privileges. Successful exploitation can allow an attacker to perform privileged actions as the victim potentially resulting in account takeover, privilege escalation, or service disruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55758 | 2 Jdownloads, Joomla | 3 Jdownloads, Joomla, Joomla! | 2025-10-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| Multiple CSRF attack vectors in JDownloads component 1.0.0-4.0.47 for Joomla were discovered. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57931 | 2 Ays-pro, Wordpress | 2 Popup Box, Wordpress | 2025-10-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Popup box allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Popup box: from n/a through 5.5.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45161 | 1 Blu-castle | 1 Bcum221e | 2025-10-30 | 4.6 Medium |
| A CSRF issue was discovered in the administrative web GUI in Blu-Castle BCUM221E 1.0.0P220507. This can be exploited via a URL, an image load, an XMLHttpRequest, etc. and can result in exposure of data or unintended code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10930 | 1 Drupal | 2 Currency, Drupal | 2025-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Currency allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Currency: from 0.0.0 before 3.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62797 | 1 Rathena | 1 Fluxcp | 2025-10-30 | N/A |
| FluxCP is a web-based Control Panel for rAthena servers written in PHP. A critical Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the FluxCP-based website template used by multiple rAthena/Ragnarok servers. State-changing POST endpoints accept browser-initiated requests that are authorized solely by the session cookie without per-request anti-CSRF tokens or robust Origin/Referer validation. An attacker who can lure a logged-in user to an attacker-controlled page can cause that user to perform sensitive actions without their intent. This vulnerability is fixed with commit e3f130c. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10759 | 1 Webkul | 1 Qloapps | 2025-10-30 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in Webkul QloApps up to 1.7.0. This affects an unknown function of the component CSRF Token Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument token results in authorization bypass. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor explains: "As We are already aware about this vulnerability and our Internal team are already working on this issue. (...) We'll implement the fix for this vulnerability in our next major release." | ||||
| CVE-2021-43158 | 1 Projectworlds | 1 Online Shopping System | 2025-10-29 | 4.3 Medium |
| In ProjectWorlds Online Shopping System PHP 1.0, a CSRF vulnerability in cart_remove.php allows a remote attacker to remove any product in the customer's cart. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56311 | 2025-10-28 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In Shenzhen C-Data Technology Co. FD602GW-DX-R410 (firmware v2.2.14), the web management interface contains an authenticated CSRF vulnerability on the reboot endpoint (/boaform/admin/formReboot). An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated administrator, causes the router to reboot without explicit user consent. This lack of CSRF protection on a sensitive administrative function can lead to denial of service by disrupting network availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27441 | 1 Zoom | 6 Meeting Software Development Kit, Rooms, Rooms Controller and 3 more | 2025-10-28 | 4.6 Medium |
| Cross site scripting in some Zoom Workplace Apps may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct a loss of integrity via adjacent network access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27442 | 1 Zoom | 6 Meeting Software Development Kit, Rooms, Rooms Controller and 3 more | 2025-10-28 | 4.6 Medium |
| Cross site scripting in some Zoom Workplace Apps may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct a loss of integrity via adjacent network access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12028 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-27 | 8.8 High |
| The IndieAuth plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4. This is due to missing nonce verification on the `login_form_indieauth()` function and the authorization endpoint at wp-login.php?action=indieauth. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force authenticated users to approve OAuth authorization requests for attacker-controlled applications via a forged request granted they can trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link or visiting a malicious page while logged in. The attacker can then exchange the stolen authorization code for an access token, effectively taking over the victim's account with the granted scopes (create, update, delete). | ||||