Filtered by vendor Adobe Subscriptions
Filtered by product Adobe Air Subscriptions
Total 146 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2009-3796 2 Adobe, Redhat 3 Adobe Air, Flash Player, Rhel Extras 2025-04-09 N/A
Adobe Flash Player before 10.0.42.34 and Adobe AIR before 1.5.3 might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, related to a "data injection vulnerability."
CVE-2009-3800 2 Adobe, Redhat 3 Adobe Air, Flash Player, Rhel Extras 2025-04-09 N/A
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Adobe Flash Player before 10.0.42.34 and Adobe AIR before 1.5.3 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors.
CVE-2009-3799 2 Adobe, Redhat 3 Adobe Air, Flash Player, Rhel Extras 2025-04-09 N/A
Integer overflow in the Verifier::parseExceptionHandlers function in Adobe Flash Player before 10.0.42.34 and Adobe AIR before 1.5.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an SWF file with a large exception_count value that triggers memory corruption, related to "generation of ActionScript exception handlers."
CVE-2009-3798 2 Adobe, Redhat 3 Adobe Air, Flash Player, Rhel Extras 2025-04-09 N/A
Adobe Flash Player before 10.0.42.34 and Adobe AIR before 1.5.3 might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger memory corruption.
CVE-2009-3797 2 Adobe, Redhat 3 Adobe Air, Flash Player, Rhel Extras 2025-04-09 N/A
Adobe Flash Player 10.x before 10.0.42.34 and Adobe AIR before 1.5.3 might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger memory corruption.
CVE-2007-3640 1 Adobe 1 Adobe Air 2025-04-09 N/A
Adobe Integrated Runtime (AIR, aka Apollo) allows context-dependent attackers to modify arbitrary files within an executing .air file (compiled AIR application) and perform cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by an application that modifies an HTML file inside itself via JavaScript that uses an APPEND open operation and the writeUTFBytes function. NOTE: this may be an intended consequence of the AIR permission model; if so, then perhaps this issue should not be included in CVE.