Total
1671 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-35172 | 2 Shortpixel, Wordpress | 2 Shortpixel Adaptive Images, Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ShortPixel ShortPixel Adaptive Images.This issue affects ShortPixel Adaptive Images: from n/a through 3.8.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13857 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| The WPGet API – Connect to any external REST API plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.10. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0862 | 1 Proofpoint | 1 Enterprise Protection | 2025-07-12 | 5 Medium |
| The Proofpoint Encryption endpoint of Proofpoint Enterprise Protection contains a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to relay HTTP requests from the Protection server to otherwise private network addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37359 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server | 2025-07-12 | 8.6 High |
| The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. (CWE-918) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not validate the Host header of incoming HTTP/HTTPS requests. By providing URLs to unexpected hosts or ports, attackers can make it appear that the server is sending the request, possibly bypassing access controls such as firewalls that prevent the attackers from accessing the URLs directly. The server can be used as a proxy to conduct port scanning of hosts in internal networks, use other URLs such as that can access documents on the system (using file://), or use other protocols such as gopher:// or tftp://, which may provide greater control over the contents of requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22603 | 1 Significant-gravitas | 1 Autogpt | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| AutoGPT is a platform that allows users to create, deploy, and manage continuous artificial intelligence agents that automate complex workflows. Versions prior to autogpt-platform-beta-v0.4.2 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability inside component (or block) `Send Web Request`. The root cause is that IPV6 address is not restricted or filtered, which allows attackers to perform a server side request forgery to visit an IPV6 service. autogpt-platform-beta-v0.4.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25297 | 1 Humansignal | 1 Label Studio | 2025-07-12 | 8.6 High |
| Label Studio is an open source data labeling tool. Prior to version 1.16.0, Label Studio's S3 storage integration feature contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its endpoint configuration. When creating an S3 storage connection, the application allows users to specify a custom S3 endpoint URL via the s3_endpoint parameter. This endpoint URL is passed directly to the boto3 AWS SDK without proper validation or restrictions on the protocol or destination. The vulnerability allows an attacker to make the application send HTTP requests to arbitrary internal services by specifying them as the S3 endpoint. When the storage sync operation is triggered, the application attempts to make S3 API calls to the specified endpoint, effectively making HTTP requests to the target service and returning the response in error messages. This SSRF vulnerability enables attackers to bypass network segmentation and access internal services that should not be accessible from the external network. The vulnerability is particularly severe because error messages from failed requests contain the full response body, allowing data exfiltration from internal services. Version 1.16.0 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25301 | 1 Danielgatis | 1 Rembg | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| Rembg is a tool to remove images background. In Rembg 2.0.57 and earlier, the /api/remove endpoint takes a URL query parameter that allows an image to be fetched, processed and returned. An attacker may be able to query this endpoint to view pictures hosted on the internal network of the rembg server. This issue may lead to Information Disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27152 | 1 Axios | 1 Axios | 2025-07-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js. The issue occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios. Even if baseURL is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios. This issue is fixed in 1.8.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27817 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Kafka, Amq Streams | 2025-07-11 | 7.5 High |
| A possible arbitrary file read and SSRF vulnerability has been identified in Apache Kafka Client. Apache Kafka Clients accept configuration data for setting the SASL/OAUTHBEARER connection with the brokers, including "sasl.oauthbearer.token.endpoint.url" and "sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url". Apache Kafka allows clients to read an arbitrary file and return the content in the error log, or sending requests to an unintended location. In applications where Apache Kafka Clients configurations can be specified by an untrusted party, attackers may use the "sasl.oauthbearer.token.endpoint.url" and "sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url" configuratin to read arbitrary contents of the disk and environment variables or make requests to an unintended location. In particular, this flaw may be used in Apache Kafka Connect to escalate from REST API access to filesystem/environment/URL access, which may be undesirable in certain environments, including SaaS products. Since Apache Kafka 3.9.1/4.0.0, we have added a system property ("-Dorg.apache.kafka.sasl.oauthbearer.allowed.urls") to set the allowed urls in SASL JAAS configuration. In 3.9.1, it accepts all urls by default for backward compatibility. However in 4.0.0 and newer, the default value is empty list and users have to set the allowed urls explicitly. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42965 | 2025-07-11 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| SAP CMC Promotion Management allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate internal network systems by submitting crafted requests during job source configuration. By analysing response times for various IP addresses and ports, the attacker can infer valid network endpoints. Successful exploitation may lead to information disclosure. This vulnerability does not impact the integrity or availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22952 | 1 Usememos | 1 Memos | 2025-07-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| elestio memos v0.23.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs, which can be exploited to perform SSRF attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24954 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Server, Windows 10 1507 and 11 more | 2025-07-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-38109 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Health Bot | 2025-07-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38206 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Copilot Studio | 2025-07-10 | 8.5 High |
| An authenticated attacker can bypass Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection in Microsoft Copilot Studio to leak sensitive information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2023-37230 | 1 Loftware | 1 Spectrum | 2025-07-10 | 8.8 High |
| Loftware Spectrum (testDeviceConnection) before 5.1 allows SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0188 | 1 Gaizhenbiao | 1 Chuanhuchatgpt | 2025-07-09 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt version 20240914. The vulnerability allows an attacker to construct a response link by saving the response in a folder named after the SHA-1 hash of the target URL. This enables the attacker to access the response directly, potentially leading to unauthorized access to internal systems, data theft, service disruption, or further attacks such as port scanning and accessing metadata endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1970 | 1 Webtoffee | 1 Import Export Wordpress Users | 2025-07-09 | 7.6 High |
| The Export and Import Users and Customers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.2 via the validate_file() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6729 | 1 Qazomardok | 1 Paymaster For Woocommerce | 2025-07-09 | 6.4 Medium |
| The PayMaster for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.4.31 via the 'wp_ajax_paym_status' AJAX action This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1912 | 1 Webtoffee | 1 Product Import Export For Woocommerce | 2025-07-09 | 7.6 High |
| The Product Import Export for WooCommerce – Import Export Product CSV Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0 via the validate_file() Function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26990 | 1 Royal-elementor-addons | 1 Royal Elementor Addons | 2025-07-08 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Royal Royal Elementor Addons allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Royal Elementor Addons: from n/a through 1.7.1006. | ||||