Total
1579 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-40312 | 1 Givewp | 1 Givewp | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in GiveWP GiveWP – Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform.This issue affects GiveWP – Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform: from n/a through 2.25.1. | ||||
CVE-2022-40305 | 1 Canto | 1 Canto | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
A Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Canto Cumulus through 11.1.3 allows attackers to enumerate the internal network, overload network resources, and possibly have unspecified other impact via the server parameter to the /cwc/login login form. | ||||
CVE-2022-40146 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Batik, Debian Linux, Camel Spring Boot and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to access files using a Jar url. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | ||||
CVE-2022-38648 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Batik, Debian Linux, Camel Spring Boot and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to fetch external resources. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | ||||
CVE-2022-38398 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Batik, Debian Linux, Camel Spring Boot and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14. | ||||
CVE-2022-38298 | 1 Appsmith | 1 Appsmith | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
Appsmith v1.7.11 was discovered to allow attackers to execute an authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via redirecting incoming requests to the AWS internal metadata endpoint. | ||||
CVE-2022-38292 | 1 Slims | 1 Senayan Library Management System | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
SLiMS Senayan Library Management System v9.4.2 was discovered to contain multiple Server-Side Request Forgeries via the components /bibliography/marcsru.php and /bibliography/z3950sru.php. | ||||
CVE-2022-37041 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
An issue was discovered in ProxyServlet.java in the /proxy servlet in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) 8.8.15 and 9.0. The value of the X-Forwarded-Host header overwrites the value of the Host header in proxied requests. The value of X-Forwarded-Host header is not checked against the whitelist of hosts that ZCS is allowed to proxy to (the zimbraProxyAllowedDomains setting). | ||||
CVE-2022-36997 | 1 Veritas | 4 Flex Appliance, Flex Scale, Netbackup and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup 8.1.x through 8.1.2, 8.2, 8.3.x through 8.3.0.2, 9.x through 9.0.0.1, and 9.1.x through 9.1.0.1 (and related NetBackup products). An attacker with authenticated access to a NetBackup Client could remotely trigger impacts that include arbitrary file read, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), and denial of service. | ||||
CVE-2022-36802 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Jira Align | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 Medium |
The ManageJiraConnectors API in Atlassian Jira Align before version 10.109.2 allows remote attackers to exploit this issue to access internal network resources via a Server-Side Request Forgery. This can be exploited by a remote, unauthenticated attacker with Super Admin privileges by sending a specially crafted HTTP request. | ||||
CVE-2022-36663 | 1 Gluu | 1 Oxauth | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
Gluu Oxauth before v4.4.1 allows attackers to execute blind SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) attacks via a crafted request_uri parameter. | ||||
CVE-2022-36551 | 1 Heartex | 1 Label Studio | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Data Import module in Heartex - Label Studio Community Edition versions 1.5.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user to access arbitrary files on the system. Furthermore, self-registration is enabled by default in these versions of Label Studio enabling a remote attacker to create a new account and then exploit the SSRF. | ||||
CVE-2022-34013 | 1 Zhyd | 1 Oneblog | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
OneBlog v2.3.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the Logo parameter under the Link module. | ||||
CVE-2022-34011 | 1 Zhyd | 1 Oneblog | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
OneBlog v2.3.4 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the parameter entryUrls. | ||||
CVE-2022-32995 | 1 Halo | 1 Halo | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
Halo CMS v1.5.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the template remote download function. | ||||
CVE-2022-32457 | 1 Digiwin | 1 Business Process Management | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
Digiwin BPM has inadequate filtering for URL parameter. An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform Blind SSRF attack to discover internal network topology base on URL error response. | ||||
CVE-2022-31830 | 1 Baidu | 1 Kity Minder | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
Kity Minder v1.3.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the init function at ImageCapture.class.php. | ||||
CVE-2022-31827 | 1 Monstaftp | 1 Monstaftp | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
MonstaFTP v2.10.3 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the function performFetchRequest at HTTPFetcher.php. | ||||
CVE-2022-31776 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datapower Gateway | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
IBM DataPower Gateway 10.0.2.0 through 10.0.4.0, 10.0.1.0 through 10.0.1.8, 10.5.0.0, and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.21 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 228433. | ||||
CVE-2022-31393 | 1 Jizhicms | 1 Jizhicms | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
Jizhicms v2.2.5 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the Index function in app/admin/c/PluginsController.php. |