Filtered by vendor Checkpoint
Subscriptions
Total
131 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2000-0582 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a stream of invalid commands (such as binary zeros) to the SMTP Security Server proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2002-2405 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 4.1 and Next Generation (NG), with UserAuth configured to proxy HTTP traffic only, allows remote attackers to pass unauthorized HTTPS, FTP and possibly other traffic through the firewall. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2889 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Connectra Ngx | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point NGX R60 does not properly verify packets against the predefined service group "CIFS" rule, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2932 | 1 Checkpoint | 2 Zonealarm, Zonealarm Security Suite | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple Check Point Zone Labs ZoneAlarm products before 7.0.362, including ZoneAlarm Security Suite 5.5.062.004 and 6.5.737, use insecure default permissions for critical files, which allows local users to gain privileges or bypass security controls. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0779 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Checkpoint Firewall-1 with the RSH/REXEC setting enabled allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and connect to a RSH/REXEC client via malformed connection requests. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0804 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass the directionality check via fragmented TCP connection requests or reopening closed TCP connection requests, aka "One-way Connection Enforcement Bypass." | ||||
| CVE-2000-0805 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier improperly retransmits encapsulated FWS packets, even if they do not come from a valid FWZ client, aka "Retransmission of Encapsulated Packets." | ||||
| CVE-2000-0806 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The inter-module authentication mechanism (fwa1) in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier may allow remote attackers to conduct a denial of service, aka "Inter-module Communications Bypass." | ||||
| CVE-2000-0807 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The OPSEC communications authentication mechanism (fwn1) in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to spoof connections, aka the "OPSEC Authentication Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2000-0808 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The seed generation mechanism in the inter-module S/Key authentication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a brute force attack, aka "One-time (s/key) Password Authentication." | ||||
| CVE-2000-0809 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in Getkey in the protocol checker in the inter-module communication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0813 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to redirect FTP connections to other servers ("FTP Bounce") via invalid FTP commands that are processed improperly by FireWall-1, aka "FTP Connection Enforcement Bypass." | ||||
| CVE-2000-1037 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 session agent 3.0 through 4.1 generates different error messages for invalid user names versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to determine valid usernames and guess a password via a brute force attack. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0675 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 can be subjected to a denial of service via UDP packets that are sent through VPN-1 to port 0 of a host. | ||||
| CVE-2001-1431 | 2 Checkpoint, Nokia | 3 Firewall-1, Vpn-1, Firewall Appliance | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Nokia Firewall Appliances running IPSO 3.3 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 3, IPSO 3.4 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 4, and IPSO 3.4 or IPSO 3.4.1 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 5, when SYN Defender is configured in Active Gateway mode, does not properly rewrite the third packet of a TCP three-way handshake to use the NAT IP address, which allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2001-1499 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1 4.1SP4 using SecuRemote returns different error messages for valid and invalid users, with prompts that vary depending on the authentication method being used, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0469 | 1 Checkpoint | 4 Firewall-1, Next Generation, Ng-ai and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the ISAKMP functionality for Check Point VPN-1 and FireWall-1 NG products, before VPN-1/FireWall-1 R55 HFA-03, R54 HFA-410 and NG FP3 HFA-325, or VPN-1 SecuRemote/SecureClient R56, may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code during VPN tunnel negotiation. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4093 | 1 Checkpoint | 2 Secureclient Ng, Vpn-1 Secureclient | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point VPN-1 SecureClient NG with Application Intelligence R56, NG FP1, 4.0, and 4.1 allows remote attackers to bypass security policies by modifying the local copy of the local.scv policy file after it has been downloaded from the VPN Endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2006-0255 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Unquoted Windows search path vulnerability in Check Point VPN-1 SecureClient might allow local users to gain privileges via a malicious "program.exe" file in the C: folder, which is run when SecureClient attempts to launch the Sr_GUI.exe program. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1623 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Vpn-1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote. | ||||