Total
8382 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13282 | 1 Chunghwa Telecom | 1 Tenderdoctransfer | 2025-11-18 | 8.1 High |
| TenderDocTransfer developed by Chunghwa Telecom has a Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63717 | 2 Mayurik, Sourcecodester | 2 Pet Grooming Management Software, Pet Grooming Management Software | 2025-11-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The change password functionality at /pet_grooming/admin/change_pass.php in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. The application does not implement adequate anti-CSRF tokens or same-site cookie restrictions, allowing attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly changing their passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63716 | 2 Rems, Sourcecodester | 2 Leads Manager Tool, Leads Manager Tool | 2025-11-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The SourceCodester Leads Manager Tool v1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks that allow unauthorized state-changing operations. The application lacks CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or same-origin verification for critical endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2023-53688 | 1 Nagios | 2 Nagios Xi, Xi | 2025-11-17 | 5.4 Medium |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 5.11.3 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via the Hypermap Replay component. An attacker can submit crafted input that is not properly validated or escaped, allowing injection of malicious script that executes in the context of a victim's browser (XSS). Additionally, the component does not enforce sufficient anti-CSRF protections on state-changing operations, enabling an attacker to induce authenticated users to perform unwanted actions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63710 | 2 Pijey, Sourcecodester | 2 Simple Public Chat Room, Simple Public Chat Room | 2025-11-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The send_message.php endpoint in SourceCodester Simple Public Chat Room 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application does not implement any CSRF-protection mechanisms such as tokens, nonces, or same-site cookie restrictions. An attacker can create a malicious HTML page that, when visited by an authenticated user, will automatically submit a forged POST request to the vulnerable endpoint. This request will be executed with the victim's privileges, allowing the attacker to perform unauthorized actions on their behalf, such as sending arbitrary messages in any chat room. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63711 | 2 Lerouxyxchire, Sourcecodester | 2 Client Database Management System, Client Database Management System | 2025-11-17 | 7.1 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 allows an attacker to cause an authenticated administrative user to perform user deletion actions without their consent. The application's user deletion endpoint (e.g., superadmin_user_delete.php) accepts POST requests containing a user_id parameter and does not enforce request origin or anti-CSRF tokens. Because the endpoint lacks proper authentication/authorization checks and CSRF protections, a remote attacker can craft a malicious page that triggers deletion when visited by an authenticated admin, resulting in arbitrary removal of user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13119 | 3 Fabian, Fabianros, Sourcecodester | 3 Simple E-banking System, Simple E-banking System, Simple Cafe Billing System | 2025-11-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in Fabian Ros/SourceCodester Simple E-Banking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58469 | 1 Qnap | 1 Qulog Center | 2025-11-14 | 8.8 High |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect QuLog Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuLog Center 1.8.2.927 ( 2025/09/17 ) and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-60645 | 2025-11-14 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in xxl-api v1.3.0 allows attackers to arbitrarily add users to the management module via a crafted GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57310 | 2025-11-14 | 8.8 High | ||
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Salmen2/Simple-Faucet-Script v1.07 via crafted POST request to admin.php?p=ads&c=1 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64482 | 1 Enalean | 1 Tuleap | 2025-11-14 | 4.6 Medium |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1762267347 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 17.01-, 16.13-6, and 16.12-9 don't have cross-site request forgery protections in the file release system. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1762267347, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-1, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-6, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-9 fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64117 | 1 Enalean | 1 Tuleap | 2025-11-14 | 4.6 Medium |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1761813675 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 16.13-5 and 16.12-8 don't have cross-site request forgery protection in the management of SVN commit rules and immutable tags. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1761813675, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-5, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-8 contain a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59480 | 1 Mattermost | 2 Mattermost, Mattermost Mobile | 2025-11-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| Mattermost Mobile Apps versions <=2.32.0 fail to verify that SSO redirect tokens originate from the trusted server, which allows a malicious Mattermost instance or on-path attacker to obtain user session credentials via crafted token-in-URL responses | ||||
| CVE-2025-64262 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ramon fincken Auto Prune Posts auto-prune-posts allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Prune Posts: from n/a through <= 3.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64271 | 2 Hasthemes, Wordpress | 2 Wp Plugin Manager, Wordpress | 2025-11-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes WP Plugin Manager wp-plugin-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Plugin Manager: from n/a through <= 1.4.7. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12590 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| The YSlider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce verification on the content configuration page and insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The injected scripts will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53829 | 1 Ericsson | 1 Codechecker | 2025-11-14 | 8.2 High |
| CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. Cross-site request forgery allows an unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of a logged in user, and use the web API with the same permissions, including but not limited to adding, removing or editing products. The attacker needs to know the ID of the available products to modify or delete them. The attacker cannot directly exfiltrate data (view) from CodeChecker, due to being limited to form-based CSRF. This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.24.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12901 | 2 Asgaros, Wordpress | 2 Asgaros Forum, Wordpress | 2025-11-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Asgaros Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the set_subscription_level() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the subscription settings of authenticated users via a forged request granted they can trick a logged-in user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7297 | 1 Reneade | 1 Twitterposts | 2025-11-13 | 3.5 Low |
| The TwitterPosts WordPress plugin through 1.0.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2025-5732 | 1 Carmelo | 1 Traffic Offense Reporting System | 2025-11-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in code-projects Traffic Offense Reporting System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||