Total
7939 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-31915 | 2025-05-19 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in kamleshyadav Pixel WordPress Form BuilderPlugin & Autoresponder allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Pixel WordPress Form BuilderPlugin & Autoresponder: from n/a through 1.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11842 | 1 Digireturn | 1 Shipping By Weight For Woocommerce | 2025-05-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| The DN Shipping by Weight for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.2 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-10480 | 1 Wp3dprinting | 1 3dprint Lite | 2025-05-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| The 3DPrint Lite WordPress plugin before 2.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45983 | 1 Kishan0725 | 1 Hospital Management System | 2025-05-16 | 6.3 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in kishan0725's Hospital Management System version 6.3.5. The vulnerability allows an attacker to craft a malicious HTML form that submits a request to delete a doctor record. By enticing an authenticated admin user to visit the specially crafted web page, the attacker can leverage the victim's browser to make unauthorized requests to the vulnerable endpoint, effectively allowing the attacker to perform actions on behalf of the admin without their consent. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6845 | 1 Theresehansen | 1 Commenttweets | 2025-05-16 | 8.8 High |
| The CommentTweets WordPress plugin through 0.6 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks | ||||
| CVE-2025-32922 | 2025-05-16 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tobias WP2LEADS allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP2LEADS: from n/a through 3.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34020 | 1 Resiot | 1 Iot Platform And Lorawan Network Server | 2025-05-16 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ResIOT ResIOT IOT Platform + LoRaWAN Network Server through 4.1.1000114 allows attackers to add new admin users to the platform or other unspecified impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7269 | 1 Artplacer | 1 Artplacer Widget | 2025-05-16 | 7.5 High |
| The ArtPlacer Widget WordPress plugin before 2.21.2 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-25419 | 1 Flusity | 1 Flusity | 2025-05-15 | 8.8 High |
| flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/update_menu.php. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25418 | 1 Flusity | 1 Flusity | 2025-05-15 | 8.8 High |
| flusity-CMS v2.33 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component /core/tools/delete_menu.php. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24468 | 1 Flusity | 1 Flusity | 2025-05-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in flusity-CMS v.2.33 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the add_customblock.php. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2299 | 1 Theluckywp | 1 Luckywp Table Of Contents | 2025-05-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The LuckyWP Table of Contents plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ajaxEdit' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24819 | 1 Icinga | 1 Icingaweb2-module-incubator | 2025-05-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| icingaweb2-module-incubator is a working project of bleeding edge Icinga Web 2 libraries. In affected versions the class `gipfl\Web\Form` is the base for various concrete form implementations [1] and provides protection against cross site request forgery (CSRF) by default. This is done by automatically adding an element with a CSRF token to any form, unless explicitly disabled, but even if enabled, the CSRF token (sent during a client's submission of a form relying on it) is not validated. This enables attackers to perform changes on behalf of a user which, unknowingly, interacts with a prepared link or website. The version 0.22.0 is available to remedy this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-42078 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac1206, Ac1206 Firmware | 2025-05-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Tenda AC1206 US_AC1206V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.23_multi_TD01 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolRestoreSet. | ||||
| CVE-2022-42077 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac1206, Ac1206 Firmware | 2025-05-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Tenda AC1206 US_AC1206V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.23_multi_TD01 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6024 | 1 Adamsolymosi | 1 Contentlock | 2025-05-15 | 8.8 High |
| The ContentLock WordPress plugin through 1.0.3 does not have CSRF check in place when deleting groups or emails, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin remove them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-3632 | 1 Codepeople | 1 Smart Image Gallery | 2025-05-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| The Smart Image Gallery WordPress plugin before 1.0.19 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2022-42087 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ax1803, Ax1803 Firmware | 2025-05-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Tenda AX1803 US_AX1803v2.0br_v1.0.0.1_2994_CN_ZGYD01_4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function fromSysToolReboot. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5030 | 2 Cminds, Creativemindssolutions | 2 Cm Table Of Contents, Cm-table-of-content | 2025-05-15 | 3.8 Low |
| The CM Table Of Contents WordPress plugin before 1.2.3 does not have CSRF check in place when resetting its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin perform such action via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2022-42086 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ax1803, Ax1803 Firmware | 2025-05-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Tenda AX1803 US_AX1803v2.0br_v1.0.0.1_2994_CN_ZGYD01_4 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via function TendaAteMode. | ||||