Total
310 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38226 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Office, Publisher | 2025-07-30 | 7.3 High |
| Microsoft Publisher Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-0411 | 1 7-zip | 1 7-zip | 2025-07-30 | 7.0 High |
| 7-Zip Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of 7-Zip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, 7-Zip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25456. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8032 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 4 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 1 more | 2025-07-28 | 8.1 High |
| XSLT document loading did not correctly propagate the source document which bypassed its CSP. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 141, Firefox ESR < 128.13, Firefox ESR < 140.1, Thunderbird < 141, Thunderbird < 128.13, and Thunderbird < 140.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27700 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-07-24 | 8.4 High |
| There is a possible bypass of carrier restrictions due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3453 | 1 Lenovo | 42 730s-13iml, 730s-13iml Firmware, Ideacentre Aio 5-24imb05 and 39 more | 2025-07-24 | 6.8 Medium |
| Some Lenovo Notebook, ThinkPad, and Lenovo Desktop systems have BIOS modules unprotected by Intel Boot Guard that could allow an attacker with physical access the ability to write to the SPI flash storage. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3893 | 1 Blackberry | 1 Qnx Software Development Platform | 2025-07-22 | 1.9 Low |
| In BlackBerry QNX Software Development Platform (SDP) 6.6.0, the default configuration of the QNX SDP system did not in all circumstances prevent attackers from modifying the GOT or PLT tables with buffer overflow attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30052 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Visual Studio 2019, Visual Studio 2022 | 2025-07-16 | 4.7 Medium |
| Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-52951 | 1 Juniper Networks | 1 Junos Os | 2025-07-15 | 5.8 Medium |
| A Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in kernel filter processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker sending IPv6 traffic destined to the device to effectively bypass any firewall filtering configured on the interface. Due to an issue with Junos OS kernel filter processing, the 'payload-protocol' match is not being supported, causing any term containing it to accept all packets without taking any other action. In essence, these firewall filter terms were being processed as an 'accept' for all traffic on the interface destined for the control plane, even when used in combination with other match criteria. This issue only affects firewall filters protecting the device's control plane. Transit firewall filtering is unaffected by this vulnerability. This issue affects Junos OS: * all versions before 21.2R3-S9, * from 21.4 before 21.4R3-S11, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S7, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S7, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S4, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S5, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2-S1, * from 24.4 before 24.4R1-S2, 24.4R2. This is a more complete fix for previously published CVE-2024-21607 (JSA75748). | ||||
| CVE-2025-46358 | 1 Emerson | 1 Valvelink | 2025-07-15 | 7.7 High |
| Emerson ValveLink products do not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6427 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2025-07-14 | 9.1 Critical |
| An attacker was able to bypass the `connect-src` directive of a Content Security Policy by manipulating subdocuments. This would have also hidden the connections from the Network tab in Devtools. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 140 and Thunderbird < 140. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31142 | 1 Xen | 1 Xen | 2025-07-13 | 7.5 High |
| Because of a logical error in XSA-407 (Branch Type Confusion), the mitigation is not applied properly when it is intended to be used. XSA-434 (Speculative Return Stack Overflow) uses the same infrastructure, so is equally impacted. For more details, see: https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-407.html https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-434.html | ||||
| CVE-2024-51481 | 1 Nixos | 1 Nix | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
| Nix is a package manager for Linux and other Unix systems. On macOS, built-in builders (such as `builtin:fetchurl`, exposed to users with `import <nix/fetchurl.nix>`) were not executed in the macOS sandbox. Thus, these builders (which are running under the `nixbld*` users) had read access to world-readable paths and write access to world-writable paths outside of the sandbox. This issue is fixed in 2.18.9, 2.19.7, 2.20.9, 2.21.5, 2.22.4, 2.23.4, and 2.24.10. Note that sandboxing is not enabled by default on macOS. The Nix sandbox is not primarily intended as a security mechanism, but as an aid to improve reproducibility and purity of Nix builds. However, sandboxing *can* mitigate the impact of other security issues by limiting what parts of the host system a build has access to. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11197 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-07-12 | 4.2 Medium |
| The Lock User Account plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to user lock bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to permitting application password logins when user accounts are locked. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with existing application passwords, to interact with the vulnerable site via an API such as XML-RPC or REST despite their account being locked. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33050 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 3 more | 2025-07-11 | 7.5 High |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32725 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 3 more | 2025-07-11 | 7.5 High |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47160 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-07-11 | 5.4 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39929 | 1 Exim | 1 Exim | 2025-07-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| Exim through 4.97.1 misparses a multiline RFC 2231 header filename, and thus remote attackers can bypass a $mime_filename extension-blocking protection mechanism, and potentially deliver executable attachments to the mailboxes of end users. | ||||
| CVE-2023-29354 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2025-07-10 | 4.7 Medium |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-38180 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-07-10 | 8.8 High |
| Windows SmartScreen Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-41224 | 2025-07-08 | 8.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.0). The affected products do not properly enforce interface access restrictions when changing from management to non-management interface configurations until a system reboot occurs, despite configuration being saved. This could allow an attacker with network access and credentials to gain access to device through non-management and maintain SSH access to the device until reboot. | ||||