Total
8237 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-11442 | 1 Jhumanj | 1 Opnform | 2025-10-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in JhumanJ OpnForm up to 1.9.3. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor has stated that API calls require authentication through Authorization Bearer Tokens, so classic CSRF attacks do not apply here. An attacker would need to possess the JWT through means such as XSS which were mitigated, disabling any form of initial access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3257 | 1 Xujiangfei | 1 Admintwo | 2025-10-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in xujiangfei admintwo 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /user/updateSet. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36452 | 1 Webmin | 1 Webmin | 2025-10-08 | 3.1 Low |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ajaxterm module of Webmin versions prior to 2.003. If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended operations may be performed when a user views a malicious page while logged in. As a result, data within a system may be referred, a webpage may be altered, or a server may be permanently halted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11029 | 2 Givanz, Vvveb | 2 Vvveb, Vvveb | 2025-10-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| A weakness has been identified in givanz Vvveb up to 1.0.7.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Executing manipulation can lead to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. Once again the project maintainer reacted very professional: "I accept the existence of these vulnerabilities. (...) I fixed the code to remove these vulnerabilities and will push the code to github and make a new release." | ||||
| CVE-2025-22963 | 1 Sismics | 1 Teedy | 2025-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| Teedy through 1.11 allows CSRF for account takeover via POST /api/user/admin. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61604 | 1 Wegia | 1 Wegia | 2025-10-07 | 7.1 High |
| WeGIA is an open source web manager with a focus on charitable institutions. Versions 3.4.12 and below contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. The delete operation for the Almoxarifado entity is exposed via HTTP GET without CSRF protection, allowing a third-party site to trigger the action using the victim’s authenticated session. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4552 | 1 Armandofiore | 1 Fl3r Feelbox | 2025-10-07 | 6.1 Medium |
| The FL3R FeelBox WordPress plugin through 8.1 does not have CSRF check when updating its settings, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2022-4553 | 1 Armandofiore | 1 Fl3r Feelbox | 2025-10-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| The FL3R FeelBox WordPress plugin through 8.1 does not have CSRF check when updating reseting moods which could allow attackers to make logged in admins perform such action via a CSRF attack and delete the lydl_posts & lydl_poststimestamp DB tables | ||||
| CVE-2014-2369 | 1 Omron | 6 Ns10 Hmi Terminal, Ns12 Hmi Terminal, Ns15 Hmi Terminal and 3 more | 2025-10-06 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web application on Omron NS5, NS8, NS10, NS12, and NS15 HMI terminals 8.1xx through 8.68x allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9886 | 2 Sergiotrinity, Wordpress | 2 Trinity Audio, Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Trinity Audio – Text to Speech AI audio player to convert content into audio plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.20.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the '/admin/inc/post-management.php' file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to activate/deactivate posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9897 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The AP Background plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.8.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the advParallaxBackAdminSaveSlider function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create or modify background sliders via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9892 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Restrict User Registration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9889 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The ContentMX Content Publisher plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmx_activate_connection function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bind their own ContentMX connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8669 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Customify theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in version 0.4.11. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reset_customize_section function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset theme customization settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9884 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Mobile Site Redirect plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9945 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Optimize More! – CSS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reset_plugin function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's optimization settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9895 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Notification Bar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'subscriber-list-empty.php' file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to empty the subscriber list via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9630 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP SinoType plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the sinotype_config function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify typography settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9213 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 8.8 High |
| The TextBuilder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 1.0.0 to 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'handleToken' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update a user's authorization token via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Once the token is updated, an attacker can update the user's password and email address. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9885 | 2 Laudanumsoft, Wordpress | 2 Mpwizard, Wordpress | 2025-10-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| The MPWizard – Create Mercado Pago Payment Links plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the '/includes/admin/class-mpwizard-table.php' file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||