Filtered by vendor Canonical
Subscriptions
Total
4260 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-6388 | 1 Canonical | 1 Ubuntu Advantage Desktop Daemon | 2025-08-27 | 5.9 Medium |
| Marco Trevisan discovered that the Ubuntu Advantage Desktop Daemon, before version 1.12, leaks the Pro token to unprivileged users by passing the token as an argument in plaintext. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6107 | 1 Canonical | 2 Maas, Metal As A Service | 2025-08-27 | 9.6 Critical |
| Due to insufficient verification, an attacker could use a malicious client to bypass authentication checks and run RPC commands in a region. This has been addressed in MAAS and updated in the corresponding snaps. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6174 | 1 Canonical | 1 Cloud-init | 2025-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| When a non-x86 platform is detected, cloud-init grants root access to a hardcoded url with a local IP address. To prevent this, cloud-init default configurations disable platform enumeration. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6714 | 2 Canonical, Linux | 2 Ubuntu Desktop Provision, Linux Kernel | 2025-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in provd before version 0.1.5 with a setuid binary, which allows a local attacker to escalate their privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5199 | 2 Apple, Canonical | 2 Macos, Multipass | 2025-08-26 | 7.3 High |
| In Canonical Multipass up to and including version 1.15.1 on macOS, incorrect default permissions allow a local attacker to escalate privileges by modifying files executed with administrative privileges by a Launch Daemon during system startup. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0928 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2025-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| In Juju versions prior to 3.6.8 and 2.9.52, any authenticated controller user was allowed to upload arbitrary agent binaries to any model or to the controller itself, without verifying model membership or requiring explicit permissions. This enabled the distribution of poisoned binaries to new or upgraded machines, potentially resulting in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53513 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2025-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| The /charms endpoint on a Juju controller lacked sufficient authorization checks, allowing any user with an account on the controller to upload a charm. Uploading a malicious charm that exploits a Zip Slip vulnerability could allow an attacker to gain access to a machine running a unit through the affected charm. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53512 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2025-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| The /log endpoint on a Juju controller lacked sufficient authorization checks, allowing unauthorized users to access debug messages that could contain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28653 | 1 Canonical | 1 Apport | 2025-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| Users can consume unlimited disk space in /var/crash | ||||
| CVE-2020-11936 | 1 Canonical | 1 Apport | 2025-08-26 | 3.1 Low |
| gdbus setgid privilege escalation | ||||
| CVE-2022-1736 | 2 Canonical, Gnome | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Gnome-remote-desktop | 2025-08-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| Ubuntu's configuration of gnome-control-center allowed Remote Desktop Sharing to be enabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0092 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2025-08-26 | 4.9 Medium |
| An authenticated user who has read access to the juju controller model, may construct a remote request to download an arbitrary file from the controller's filesystem. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8037 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2025-08-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Vulnerable juju hook tool abstract UNIX domain socket. When combined with an attack of JUJU_CONTEXT_ID, any user on the local system with access to the default network namespace may connect to the @/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-xxxx-yyyy/agent.socket and perform actions that are normally reserved to a juju charm. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8038 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2025-08-26 | 7.9 High |
| Vulnerable juju introspection abstract UNIX domain socket. An abstract UNIX domain socket responsible for introspection is available without authentication locally to network namespace users. This enables denial of service attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9313 | 1 Canonical | 1 Authd | 2025-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Authd PAM module before version 0.3.5 can allow broker-managed users to impersonate any other user managed by the same broker and perform any PAM operation with it, including authenticating as them. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9312 | 2 Canonical, Ubuntu | 2 Authd, Authd | 2025-08-26 | 7.5 High |
| Authd, through version 0.3.6, did not sufficiently randomize user IDs to prevent collisions. A local attacker who can register user names could spoof another user's ID and gain their privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7558 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2025-08-26 | 8.7 High |
| JUJU_CONTEXT_ID is a predictable authentication secret. On a Juju machine (non-Kubernetes) or Juju charm container (on Kubernetes), an unprivileged user in the same network namespace can connect to an abstract domain socket and guess the JUJU_CONTEXT_ID value. This gives the unprivileged user access to the same information and tools as the Juju charm. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11586 | 2 Canonical, Pulseaudio | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Pulseaudio | 2025-08-26 | 4 Medium |
| Ubuntu's implementation of pulseaudio can be crashed by a malicious program if a bluetooth headset is connected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6156 | 1 Canonical | 1 Lxd | 2025-08-26 | 3.8 Low |
| Mark Laing discovered that LXD's PKI mode, until version 5.21.2, could be bypassed if the client's certificate was present in the trust store. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5138 | 1 Canonical | 1 Snapd | 2025-08-26 | 8.1 High |
| The snapctl component within snapd allows a confined snap to interact with the snapd daemon to take certain privileged actions on behalf of the snap. It was found that snapctl did not properly parse command-line arguments, allowing an unprivileged user to trigger an authorised action on behalf of the snap that would normally require administrator privileges to perform. This could possibly allow an unprivileged user to perform a denial of service or similar. | ||||