Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift
Subscriptions
Total
1104 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2012-6074 | 3 Cloudbees, Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Jenkins, Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.491, Jenkins LTS before 1.480.1, and Jenkins Enterprise 1.424.x before 1.424.6.13, 1.447.x before 1.447.4.1, and 1.466.x before 1.466.10.1 allows remote authenticated users with write access to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2013-0330 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
Unspecified vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.502 and LTS before 1.480.3 allows remote authenticated users with write access to build arbitrary jobs via unknown attack vectors. | ||||
CVE-2012-2126 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Rubygems | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Mrg and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
RubyGems before 1.8.23 does not verify an SSL certificate, which allows remote attackers to modify a gem during installation via a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
CVE-2012-6073 | 3 Cloudbees, Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Jenkins, Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
Open redirect vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.491, Jenkins LTS before 1.480.1, and Jenkins Enterprise 1.424.x before 1.424.6.13, 1.447.x before 1.447.4.1, and 1.466.x before 1.466.10.1 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2013-1808 | 2 Redhat, Zeroclipboard Project | 2 Openshift, Zeroclipboard | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ZeroClipboard.swf and ZeroClipboard10.swf in ZeroClipboard before 1.0.8, as used in em-shorty, RepRapCalculator, Fulcrum, Django, aCMS, and other products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the id parameter. NOTE: this is might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-1463. If so, it is likely that CVE-2013-1463 will be REJECTed. | ||||
CVE-2012-6072 | 3 Cloudbees, Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Jenkins, Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
CRLF injection vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.491, Jenkins LTS before 1.480.1, and Jenkins Enterprise 1.424.x before 1.424.6.13, 1.447.x before 1.447.4.1, and 1.466.x before 1.466.10.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
CVE-2012-5647 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Origin | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
Open redirect vulnerability in node-util/www/html/restorer.php in Red Hat OpenShift Origin before 1.0.5-3 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the PATH_INFO. | ||||
CVE-2012-3424 | 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more | 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
The decode_credentials method in actionpack/lib/action_controller/metal/http_authentication.rb in Ruby on Rails 3.x before 3.0.16, 3.1.x before 3.1.7, and 3.2.x before 3.2.7 converts Digest Authentication strings to symbols, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by leveraging access to an application that uses a with_http_digest helper method, as demonstrated by the authenticate_or_request_with_http_digest method. | ||||
CVE-2013-0333 | 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more | 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
lib/active_support/json/backends/yaml.rb in Ruby on Rails 2.3.x before 2.3.16 and 3.0.x before 3.0.20 does not properly convert JSON data to YAML data for processing by a YAML parser, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, conduct SQL injection attacks, or bypass authentication via crafted data that triggers unsafe decoding, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-0156. | ||||
CVE-2012-2695 | 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more | 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
The Active Record component in Ruby on Rails before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 3.1.6, and 3.2.x before 3.2.6 does not properly implement the passing of request data to a where method in an ActiveRecord class, which allows remote attackers to conduct certain SQL injection attacks via nested query parameters that leverage improper handling of nested hashes, a related issue to CVE-2012-2661. | ||||
CVE-2012-2661 | 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more | 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
The Active Record component in Ruby on Rails 3.0.x before 3.0.13, 3.1.x before 3.1.5, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 does not properly implement the passing of request data to a where method in an ActiveRecord class, which allows remote attackers to conduct certain SQL injection attacks via nested query parameters that leverage unintended recursion, a related issue to CVE-2012-2695. | ||||
CVE-2013-5573 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Jenkins, Openshift | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the default markup formatter in Jenkins 1.523 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the Description field in the user configuration. | ||||
CVE-2012-4522 | 2 Redhat, Ruby-lang | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Ruby | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
The rb_get_path_check function in file.c in Ruby 1.9.3 before patchlevel 286 and Ruby 2.0.0 before r37163 allows context-dependent attackers to create files in unexpected locations or with unexpected names via a NUL byte in a file path. | ||||
CVE-2022-43844 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2025-04-10 | 8.8 High |
IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 20.12 through 21.0.3 is vulnerable to broken access control. A user is not correctly redirected to the platform log out screen when logging out of IBM RPA for Cloud Pak. IBM X-Force ID: 239081. | ||||
CVE-2022-41740 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more | 2025-04-10 | 4.6 Medium |
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 could allow an attacker with physical access to the system to obtain highly sensitive information from system memory. IBM X-Force ID: 238053. | ||||
CVE-2025-30204 | 1 Redhat | 19 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cryostat and 16 more | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 High |
golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Starting in version 3.2.0 and prior to versions 5.2.2 and 4.5.2, the function parse.ParseUnverified splits (via a call to strings.Split) its argument (which is untrusted data) on periods. As a result, in the face of a malicious request whose Authorization header consists of Bearer followed by many period characters, a call to that function incurs allocations to the tune of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument), with a constant factor of about 16. This issue is fixed in 5.2.2 and 4.5.2. | ||||
CVE-2022-43573 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2025-04-09 | 3.1 Low |
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 is vulnerable to exposure of the name and email for the creator/modifier of platform level objects. IBM X-Force ID: 238678. | ||||
CVE-2023-0296 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2025-04-04 | 5.3 Medium |
The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw (CVE-2016-2183) was reported for the health checks port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy, hence this port might be considered as still vulnerable to the same type of vulnerability. The health checks on etcd grpc-proxy do not contain sensitive data (only metrics data), therefore the potential impact related to this vulnerability is minimal. The CVE-2023-0296 has been assigned to this issue to track the permanent fix in the etcd component. | ||||
CVE-2022-41721 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 5 H2c, Acm, Migration Toolkit Applications and 2 more | 2025-04-04 | 7.5 High |
A request smuggling attack is possible when using MaxBytesHandler. When using MaxBytesHandler, the body of an HTTP request is not fully consumed. When the server attempts to read HTTP2 frames from the connection, it will instead be reading the body of the HTTP request, which could be attacker-manipulated to represent arbitrary HTTP2 requests. | ||||
CVE-2023-22863 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 5.9 Medium |
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12.0 through 21.0.2 defaults to HTTP in some RPA commands when the prefix is not explicitly specified in the URL. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 244109. |