Total
1791 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-5818 | 2 Krasenslavov, Wordpress | 2 Featured Image Plus, Wordpress | 2025-07-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Featured Image Plus – Quick & Bulk Edit with Unsplash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.4 via the fip_get_image_options() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8020 | 2025-07-25 | 8.2 High | ||
| All versions of the package private-ip are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide an IP or hostname that resolves to a multicast IP address (224.0.0.0/4) which is not included as part of the private IP ranges in the package's source code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1220 | 1 Php | 1 Php | 2025-07-22 | 3.7 Low |
| In PHP versions:8.1.* before 8.1.33, 8.2.* before 8.2.29, 8.3.* before 8.3.23, 8.4.* before 8.4.10 some functions like fsockopen() lack validation that the hostname supplied does not contain null characters. This may lead to other functions like parse_url() treat the hostname in different way, thus opening way to security problems if the user code implements access checks before access using such functions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20288 | 1 Cisco | 2 Unified Contact Center Express, Unified Intelligence Center | 2025-07-22 | 5.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52362 | 1 Phproxy | 1 Phproxy | 2025-07-22 | 9.1 Critical |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the URL processing functionality of PHProxy version 1.1.1 and prior. The input validation for the _proxurl parameter can be bypassed, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to submit a specially crafted URL | ||||
| CVE-2025-7759 | 2025-07-22 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in thinkgem JeeSite up to 5.12.0. This affects an unknown part of the file modules/core/src/main/java/com/jeesite/common/ueditor/ActionEnter.java of the component UEditor Image Grabber. The manipulation of the argument Source leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 1c5e49b0818037452148e0f8ff69ed04cb8fefdc. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52163 | 2025-07-22 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the component TunnelServlet of agorum Software GmbH Agorum core open v11.9.2 & v11.10.1 allows attackers to forcefully initiate connections to arbitrary internal and external resources via a crafted request. This can lead to sensitive data exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46385 | 2025-07-22 | 8.6 High | ||
| CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2025-54122 | 2025-07-22 | 10 Critical | ||
| Manager-io/Manager is accounting software. A critical unauthenticated full read Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the proxy handler component of both manager Desktop and Server edition versions up to and including 25.7.18.2519. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass network isolation and access restrictions, potentially enabling access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and exfiltration of sensitive data from isolated network segments. This vulnerability is fixed in version 25.7.21.2525. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7959 | 2 Open-webui, Openwebui | 2 Open-webui, Open Webui | 2025-07-21 | 7.7 High |
| The `/openai/models` endpoint in open-webui/open-webui version 0.3.8 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An attacker can change the OpenAI URL to any URL without checks, causing the endpoint to send a request to the specified URL and return the output. This vulnerability allows the attacker to access internal services and potentially gain command execution by accessing instance secrets. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10457 | 1 Significant-gravitas | 1 Autogpt | 2025-07-21 | N/A |
| Multiple Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities were identified in the significant-gravitas/autogpt repository, specifically in the GitHub Integration and Web Search blocks. These vulnerabilities affect version agpt-platform-beta-v0.1.1. The issues arise when block inputs are controlled by untrusted sources, leading to potential credential leakage, internal network scanning, and unauthorized access to internal services, APIs, or data stores. The affected blocks include GithubListPullRequestsBlock, GithubReadPullRequestBlock, GithubAssignPRReviewerBlock, GithubListPRReviewersBlock, GithubUnassignPRReviewerBlock, GithubCommentBlock, GithubMakeIssueBlock, GithubReadIssueBlock, GithubListIssuesBlock, GithubAddLabelBlock, GithubRemoveLabelBlock, GithubListBranchesBlock, and ExtractWebsiteContentBlock. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6851 | 2 Pluginrx, Wordpress | 2 Broken Link Notifier, Wordpress | 2025-07-17 | 7.2 High |
| The Broken Link Notifier plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.0 via the ajax_blinks() function which ultimately calls the check_url_status_code() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9408 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2025-07-16 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Eclipse GlassFish since version 6.2.5 it is possible to perform a Server Side Request Forgery attack in specific endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2828 | 2 Langchain, Langchain-ai | 2 Langchain, Langchain-ai/langchain | 2025-07-16 | 10.0 Critical |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the RequestsToolkit component of the langchain-community package (specifically, langchain_community.agent_toolkits.openapi.toolkit.RequestsToolkit) in langchain-ai/langchain version 0.0.27. This vulnerability occurs because the toolkit does not enforce restrictions on requests to remote internet addresses, allowing it to also access local addresses. As a result, an attacker could exploit this flaw to perform port scans, access local services, retrieve instance metadata from cloud environments (e.g., Azure, AWS), and interact with servers on the local network. This issue has been fixed in version 0.0.28. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5817 | 1 Suhailahmad64 | 1 Amazon Products To Woocommerce | 2025-07-16 | 7.2 High |
| The Amazon Products to WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.7 via the wcta2w_get_urls(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2023-48786 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientems | 2025-07-16 | 4.1 Medium |
| A server-side request forgery vulnerability [CWE-918] in Fortinet FortiClientEMS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and before 7.2.6 may allow an authenticated attacker to perform internal requests via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48294 | 2025-07-16 | 4.4 Medium | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kerfred FG Drupal to WordPress allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects FG Drupal to WordPress: from n/a through 3.90.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36471 | 1 Apache | 1 Allura | 2025-07-15 | 7.5 High |
| Import functionality is vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks between verification and processing of the URL. Project administrators can run these imports, which could cause Allura to read from internal services and expose them. This issue affects Apache Allura from 1.0.1 through 1.16.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.17.0, which fixes the issue. If you are unable to upgrade, set "disable_entry_points.allura.importers = forge-tracker, forge-discussion" in your .ini config file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9309 | 1 Hliu | 1 Llava | 2025-07-15 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the POST /worker_generate_stream API endpoint of the Controller API Server in haotian-liu/llava version v1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6). This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the victim Controller API Server's credentials to perform unauthorized web actions or access unauthorized web resources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0184 | 1 Langgenius | 1 Dify | 2025-07-15 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in langgenius/dify version 0.10.2. The vulnerability occurs in the 'Create Knowledge' section when uploading DOCX files. If an external relationship exists in the DOCX file, the reltype value is requested as a URL using the 'requests' module instead of the 'ssrf_proxy', leading to an SSRF vulnerability. This issue was fixed in version 0.11.0. | ||||