Total
566 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-49259 | 1 Hongdian | 2 H8951-4g-esp, H8951-4g-esp Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The authentication cookies are generated using an algorithm based on the username, hardcoded secret and the up-time, and can be guessed in a reasonable time. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46133 | 1 Entronad | 1 Cryptoes | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| CryptoES is a cryptography algorithms library compatible with ES6 and TypeScript. Prior to version 2.1.0, CryptoES PBKDF2 is 1,000 times weaker than originally specified in 1993, and at least 1,300,000 times weaker than current industry standard. This is because it both defaults to SHA1, a cryptographic hash algorithm considered insecure since at least 2005, and defaults to one single iteration, a 'strength' or 'difficulty' value specified at 1,000 when specified in 1993. PBKDF2 relies on iteration count as a countermeasure to preimage and collision attacks. If used to protect passwords, the impact is high. If used to generate signatures, the impact is high. Version 2.1.0 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, configure CryptoES to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43635 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 Edge Virtualization Engine | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Vault Key Sealed With SHA1 PCRs The measured boot solution implemented in EVE OS leans on a PCR locking mechanism. Different parts of the system update different PCR values in the TPM, resulting in a unique value for each PCR entry. These PCRs are then used in order to seal/unseal a key from the TPM which is used to encrypt/decrypt the “vault” directory. This “vault” directory is the most sensitive point in the system and as such, its content should be protected. This mechanism is noted in Zededa’s documentation as the “measured boot” mechanism, designed to protect said “vault”. The code that’s responsible for generating and fetching the key from the TPM assumes that SHA256 PCRs are used in order to seal/unseal the key, and as such their presence is being checked. The issue here is that the key is not sealed using SHA256 PCRs, but using SHA1 PCRs. This leads to several issues: • Machines that have their SHA256 PCRs enabled but SHA1 PCRs disabled, as well as not sealing their keys at all, meaning the “vault” is not protected from an attacker. • SHA1 is considered insecure and reduces the complexity level required to unseal the key in machines which have their SHA1 PCRs enabled. An attacker can very easily retrieve the contents of the “vault”, which will effectively render the “measured boot” mechanism meaningless. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41928 | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The device is observed to accept deprecated TLS protocols, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41927 | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The server supports at least one cipher suite which is on the NCSC-NL list of cipher suites to be phased out, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40371 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Vios | 2024-11-21 | 6.2 Medium |
| IBM AIX 7.2, 7.3, VIOS 3.1's OpenSSH implementation could allow a non-privileged local user to access files outside of those allowed due to improper access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 263476. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3350 | 1 Ayesa | 1 Ibermatica Rps | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| A Cryptographic Issue vulnerability has been found on IBERMATICA RPS, affecting version 2019. By firstly downloading the log file, an attacker could retrieve the SQL query sent to the application in plaint text. This log file contains the password hashes coded with AES-CBC-128 bits algorithm, which can be decrypted with a .NET function, obtaining the username's password in plain text. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3089 | 1 Redhat | 18 Acm, Amq Streams, Container Native Virtualization and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 7 High |
| A compliance problem was found in the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Red Hat discovered that, when FIPS mode was enabled, not all of the cryptographic modules in use were FIPS-validated. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38730 | 1 Ibm | 1 Storage Copy Data Management | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Storage Copy Data Management 2.2.0.0 through 2.2.19.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 262268. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38371 | 1 Ibm | 2 Security Access Manager, Security Verify Access Docker | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Security Access Manager Docker 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 261198. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38361 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Cics Tx, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM CICS TX Advanced 10.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 260770. | ||||
| CVE-2023-37484 | 1 Sap | 1 Powerdesigner | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| SAP PowerDesigner - version 16.7, queries all password hashes in the backend database and compares it with the user provided one during login attempt, which might allow an attacker to access password hashes from the client's memory. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36608 | 1 Ovarro | 10 Tbox Lt2, Tbox Lt2 Firmware, Tbox Ms-cpu32 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| The affected TBox RTUs store hashed passwords using MD5 encryption, which is an insecure encryption algorithm. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35890 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 Medium |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could provide weaker than expected security, caused by the improper encoding in a local configuration file. IBM X-Force ID: 258637. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34758 | 1 Bishopfox | 1 Sliver | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| Sliver from v1.5.x to v1.5.39 has an improper cryptographic implementation, which allows attackers to execute a man-in-the-middle attack via intercepted and crafted responses. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34130 | 1 Sonicwall | 2 Analytics, Global Management System | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| SonicWall GMS and Analytics use outdated Tiny Encryption Algorithm (TEA) with a hardcoded key to encrypt sensitive data. This issue affects GMS: 9.3.2-SP1 and earlier versions; Analytics: 2.5.0.4-R7 and earlier versions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30994 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 254138 | ||||
| CVE-2023-2900 | 1 Nfine Rapid Development Platform Project | 1 Nfine Rapid Development Platform | 2024-11-21 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in NFine Rapid Development Platform 20230511. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the file /Login/CheckLogin. The manipulation leads to use of weak hash. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-229974 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28053 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Networker | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Dell NetWorker Virtual Edition versions 19.8 and below contain the use of deprecated cryptographic algorithms in the SSH component. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to some information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26276 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 248147. | ||||