Total
2022 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-42488 | 1 Cilium | 1 Cilium | 2024-09-27 | 6.8 Medium |
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.14.14 and 1.15.8, a race condition in the Cilium agent can cause the agent to ignore labels that should be applied to a node. This could in turn cause CiliumClusterwideNetworkPolicies intended for nodes with the ignored label to not apply, leading to policy bypass. This issue has been patched in Cilium v1.14.14 and v1.15.8 As the underlying issue depends on a race condition, users unable to upgrade can restart the Cilium agent on affected nodes until the affected policies are confirmed to be working as expected. | ||||
CVE-2024-23599 | 2024-09-16 | 7.9 High | ||
Race condition in Seamless Firmware Updates for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | ||||
CVE-2023-41833 | 1 Ieisystem | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2024-09-16 | 7.5 High |
A race condition in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
CVE-2024-7627 | 1 Bitapps | 1 File Manager | 2024-09-11 | 8.1 High |
The Bit File Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in versions 6.0 to 6.5.5 via the 'checkSyntax' function. This is due to writing a temporary file to a publicly accessible directory before performing file validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server if an administrator has allowed Guest User read permissions. | ||||
CVE-2024-26905 | 2024-07-29 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27430 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27428 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27427 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27426 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27425 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27424 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27423 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27422 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27421 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27420 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-27429 | 2024-05-21 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-26904 | 2024-05-21 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2023-52521 | 2024-03-05 | 5.5 Medium | ||
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2023-35825 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus, Rhev Hypervisor | 2023-11-07 | 6.4 Medium |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-3141. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-3141. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-3141 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | ||||
CVE-2022-3522 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus, Rhev Hypervisor | 2023-11-07 | 7.0 High |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |