Total
342 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-34145 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Script Security, Ocp Tools | 2025-10-10 | 8.8 High |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability involving sandbox-defined classes that shadow specific non-sandbox-defined classes in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1335.vf07d9ce377a_e and earlier allows attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34144 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Script Security, Ocp Tools | 2025-10-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability involving crafted constructor bodies in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1335.vf07d9ce377a_e and earlier allows attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43296 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2025-10-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26. An app may bypass Gatekeeper checks. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5557 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 6 Tracker Miners, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 3 more | 2025-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the tracker-miners package. A weakness in the sandbox allows a maliciously-crafted file to execute code outside the sandbox if the tracker-extract process has first been compromised by a separate vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49193 | 2025-10-06 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| The application fails to implement several security headers. These headers help increase the overall security level of the web application by e.g., preventing the application to be displayed in an iFrame (Clickjacking attacks) or not executing injected malicious JavaScript code (XSS attacks). | ||||
| CVE-2025-10157 | 1 Mmaitre314 | 1 Picklescan | 2025-10-02 | 8.8 High |
| A Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in mmaitre314 picklescan versions up to and including 0.0.30 allows a remote attacker to bypass the unsafe globals check. This is possible because the scanner performs an exact match for module names, allowing malicious payloads to be loaded via submodules of dangerous packages (e.g., 'asyncio.unix_events' instead of 'asyncio'). When the incorrectly considered safe file is loaded after scan, it can lead to the execution of malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54917 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows, Windows 10, Windows 10 1507 and 16 more | 2025-10-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows MapUrlToZone allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43273 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Macos Sequoia | 2025-10-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional sandbox restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8. A sandboxed process may be able to circumvent sandbox restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56326 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 15 Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 12 more | 2025-09-22 | 7.8 High |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10528 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 4 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 1 more | 2025-09-19 | 7.3 High |
| This vulnerability affects Firefox < 143, Firefox ESR < 140.3, Thunderbird < 143, and Thunderbird < 140.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-37124 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hp | 2 Edgeconnect Enterprise, Arubaos | 2025-09-17 | 8.6 High |
| A vulnerability in the HPE Aruba Networking SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass firewall protections. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to route potentially harmful traffic through the internal network, leading to unauthorized access or disruption of services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43330 | 1 Apple | 3 Macos, Macos Sequoia, Macos Tahoe | 2025-09-17 | 8.2 High |
| This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7, macOS Tahoe 26. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21276 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-09-09 | 7.5 High |
| Windows MapUrlToZone Denial of Service Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21211 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-09-09 | 6.8 Medium |
| Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21217 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2025-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Windows NTLM Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-21346 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel | 2025-09-09 | 7.1 High |
| Microsoft Office Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-59033 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows, Windows 10, Windows 11 and 4 more | 2025-09-09 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Microsoft vulnerable driver block list is implemented as Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) policy. On systems that do not have hypervisor-protected code integrity (HVCI) enabled, entries that specify only the to-be-signed (TBS) part of the code signer certificate are properly blocked, but entries that specify the signing certificate’s TBS hash along with a 'FileAttribRef' qualifier (such as file name or version) will not be blocked. This vulnerability affects any Windows system that does not have HVCI enabled or supported (HVCI is available in Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2016 and later). NOTE: The vendor states that the driver blocklist is intended for use with HVCI, while systems without HVCI should use App Control, and any custom blocklist entries require a granular approach for proper enforcement. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26431 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-09 | 7.8 High |
| In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java, there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0089 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to hijack the Launcher app due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48522 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | 7.8 High |
| In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way for an app to retain CDM association due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||