Total
7921 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-5938 | 1 Themebon | 1 Digital Marketing And Agency Templates Addons For Elementor | 2025-07-10 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Digital Marketing and Agency Templates Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the import_templates() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger an import via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48921 | 1 Getopensocial | 1 Open Social | 2025-07-09 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Open Social allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Open Social: from 0.0.0 before 12.3.14, from 12.4.0 before 12.4.13. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7133 | 1 Codeastro | 1 Online Movie Ticket Booking System | 2025-07-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in CodeAstro Online Movie Ticket Booking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41597 | 1 Processwire | 1 Processwire | 2025-07-09 | 4.2 Medium |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML file to the comments functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25772 | 1 Ujcms | 1 Jspxcms | 2025-07-09 | 5.1 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component /back/UserController.java of Jspxcms v9.0 to v9.5 allows attackers to arbitrarily add Administrator accounts via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7379 | 2025-07-09 | N/A | ||
| A security bypass vulnerability allows exploitation via Reverse Tabnabbing, a type of phishing attack where attackers can manipulate the content of the original tab, leading to credential theft and other security risks. This issue affects DataSync Center: from 1.1.0 before 1.1.0.r207, and from 1.2.0 before 1.2.0.r206. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47204 | 1 Davidstutz | 1 Bootstrap Multiselect | 2025-07-09 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in post.php in bootstrap-multiselect (aka Bootstrap Multiselect) 1.1.2. A PHP script in the source code echoes arbitrary POST data. If a developer adopts this structure wholesale in a live application, it could create a Reflective Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable through Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2024-13337 | 1 Cm-wp | 1 Clearfy | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Clearfy Cache – WordPress optimization plugin, Minify HTML, CSS & JS, Defer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'setup-wbcr_clearfy' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13338 | 1 Cm-wp | 1 Clearfy | 2025-07-08 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Clearfy Cache – WordPress optimization plugin, Minify HTML, CSS & JS, Defer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wclearfy_cache_delete functionality . This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to clear the cache via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53483 | 2025-07-08 | 8.8 High | ||
| ArchivePage.php, UnarchivePage.php, and VoterEligibilityPage#executeClear() do not validate request methods or CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to trigger sensitive actions if an admin visits a malicious site. This issue affects Mediawiki - SecurePoll extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.13, from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5933 | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The RD Contacto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rdWappUpdateData() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31828 | 1 Easyappointments | 1 Easy\!appointments | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in alextselegidis Easy!Appointments allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Easy!Appointments: from n/a through 1.4.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0669 | 1 Universityofcalifornia | 1 Boinc Server | 2025-07-08 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BOINC Server allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects BOINC Server: before 1.4.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5924 | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP Firebase Push Notification plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wfpn_brodcast_notification_message() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send broadcast notifications via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23972 | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brian S. Reed Contact Form 7 reCAPTCHA allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Contact Form 7 reCAPTCHA: from n/a through 1.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53568 | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tony Zeoli Radio Station allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Radio Station: from n/a through 2.5.12. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53569 | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trust Payments Trust Payments Gateway for WooCommerce (JavaScript Library) allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Trust Payments Gateway for WooCommerce (JavaScript Library): from n/a through 1.3.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6041 | 2025-07-08 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The yContributors plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yContributors' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20321 | 2025-07-08 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.3, 9.3.5, 9.2.7 and 9.1.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.104, 9.3.2408.114, and 9.2.2406.119, an unauthenticated attacker can send a specially-crafted SPL search that could change the membership state in a Splunk Search Head Cluster (SHC) through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), potentially leading to the removal of the captain or a member of the SHC.<br><br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the administrator-level victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20322 | 2025-07-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.3, 9.3.5, 9.2.7, and 9.1.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.104, 9.3.2408.113, and 9.2.2406.119, an unauthenticated attacker could send a specially-crafted SPL search command that could trigger a rolling restart in the Search Head Cluster through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), potentially leading to a denial of service (DoS).<br><br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the administrator-level victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.<br><br>See [How rolling restart works](https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.4.2/DistSearch/RestartSHC) for more information. | ||||