Total
8382 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-24897 | 1 Misskey | 1 Misskey | 2025-11-26 | 8.2 High |
| Misskey is an open source, federated social media platform. Starting in version 12.109.0 and prior to version 2025.2.0-alpha.0, due to a lack of CSRF protection and the lack of proper security attributes in the authentication cookies of Bull's dashboard, some of the APIs of bull-board may be subject to CSRF attacks. There is a risk of this vulnerability being used for attacks with relatively large impact on availability and integrity, such as the ability to add arbitrary jobs. This vulnerability was fixed in 2025.2.0-alpha.0. As a workaround, block all access to the `/queue` directory with a web application firewall (WAF). | ||||
| CVE-2025-8119 | 2 Pad, Widzialni | 2 Pad Cms, Pad Cms | 2025-11-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| PAD CMS is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in reset password's functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the victim, will automatically send a POST request changing currently logged user's password to defined by the attacker value. This issue affects all 3 templates: www, bip and www+bip. This product is End-Of-Life and producent will not publish patches for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63952 | 1 Magewell | 1 Convert | 2025-11-26 | 5.7 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the /mwapi?method=add-user component of Magewell Pro Convert v1.2.213 allows attackers to arbitrarily create accounts via a crafted GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63953 | 1 Magewell | 1 Convert | 2025-11-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the /usapi?method=add-user component of Magewell Pro Convert v1.2.213 allows attackers to arbitrarily create accounts via a crafted GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12587 | 2 Webgarh, Wordpress | 2 Peer Publish, Wordpress | 2025-11-26 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Peer Publish plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the website management pages. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, modify, or delete website configurations via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60739 | 2025-11-25 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ilevia EVE X1 Server Firmware Version v4.7.18.0.eden and before, Logic Version v6.00 - 2025_07_21 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the /bh_web_backend component | ||||
| CVE-2025-62497 | 2025-11-25 | N/A | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in SNC-CX600W versions prior to Ver.2.8.0. If a user accesses a specially crafted webpage while logged in, unintended operations may be performed. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11712 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 3 Firefox, Thunderbird, Enterprise Linux | 2025-11-25 | N/A |
| POST requests made by NPAPI plugins, such as Flash, that receive a status 308 redirect response can bypass CORS requirements. This can allow an attacker to perform Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 60.8, Firefox < 68, and Thunderbird < 60.8. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6105 | 1 Jflyfox | 1 Jfinal Cms | 2025-11-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in jflyfox jfinal_cms 5.0.1 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file HOME.java. The manipulation of the argument Logout leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12586 | 2025-11-25 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Conditional Maintenance Mode for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation when toggling the maintenance mode status. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enable or disable the site's maintenance mode via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5410 | 1 Mist | 1 Mist | 2025-11-25 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Mist Community Edition up to 4.7.1. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function session_start_response of the file src/mist/api/auth/middleware.py. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.7.2 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as db10ecb62ac832c1ed4924556d167efb9bc07fad. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56140 | 2 Astro, Withastro | 2 Astro, Astro | 2025-11-25 | 5.9 Medium |
| Astro is a web framework for content-driven websites. In affected versions a bug in Astro’s CSRF-protection middleware allows requests to bypass CSRF checks. When the `security.checkOrigin` configuration option is set to `true`, Astro middleware will perform a CSRF check. However, a vulnerability exists that can bypass this security. A semicolon-delimited parameter is allowed after the type in `Content-Type`. Web browsers will treat a `Content-Type` such as `application/x-www-form-urlencoded; abc` as a `simple request` and will not perform preflight validation. In this case, CSRF is not blocked as expected. Additionally, the `Content-Type` header is not required for a request. This issue has been addressed in version 4.16.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56400 | 2025-11-24 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the OAuth implementation of the Tuya SDK 6.5.0 for Android and iOS, affects the Tuya Smart and Smartlife mobile applications, as well as other third-party applications that integrate the SDK, allows an attacker to link their own Amazon Alexa account to a victim's Tuya account. The applications fail to validate the OAuth state parameter during the account linking flow, enabling a cross-site request forgery (CSRF)-like attack. By tricking the victim into clicking a crafted authorization link, an attacker can complete the OAuth flow on the victim's behalf, resulting in unauthorized Alexa access to the victim's Tuya-connected devices. This affects users regardless of prior Alexa linkage and does not require the Tuya application to be active at the time. Successful exploitation may allow remote control of devices such as cameras, doorbells, door locks, or alarms. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13142 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Custom Post Type plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the custom post type deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete custom post types via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13134 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-24 | 6.1 Medium |
| The AuthorSure plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'authorsure' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65107 | 1 Langfuse | 1 Langfuse | 2025-11-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| Langfuse is an open source large language model engineering platform. In versions from 2.95.0 to before 2.95.12 and from 3.17.0 to before 3.131.0, in SSO provider configurations without an explicit AUTH_<PROVIDER>_CHECK setting, a potential account takeover may happen if an authenticated user is made to call a specifically crafted URL via a CSRF or phishing attack. This issue has been patched in versions 2.95.12 and 3.131.0. A workaround for this issue involves setting AUTH_<PROVIDER>_CHECK. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55057 | 1 Maxum | 1 Rumpus | 2025-11-24 | 4.5 Medium |
| Multiple CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) | ||||
| CVE-2025-13177 | 2 Bdtask, Codecanyon | 2 Saleserp, Saleserp | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in Bdtask/CodeCanyon SalesERP up to 20250728. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13179 | 1 Bdtask | 2 Wholesale, Wholesale Inventory Control And Inventory Management System | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask/CodeCanyon Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System up to 20250320. This issue affects some unknown processing. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62346 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Glovius Cloud | 2025-11-24 | 6.8 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. | ||||