Total
64 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-20278 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2025-08-01 | 6.5 Medium |
A vulnerability in the NETCONF feature of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges to root on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted input over NETCONF to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges from Administrator to root. | ||||
CVE-2024-5217 | 1 Servicenow | 1 Servicenow | 2025-07-30 | 9.8 Critical |
ServiceNow has addressed an input validation vulnerability that was identified in the Washington DC, Vancouver, and earlier Now Platform releases. This vulnerability could enable an unauthenticated user to remotely execute code within the context of the Now Platform. The vulnerability is addressed in the listed patches and hot fixes below, which were released during the June 2024 patching cycle. If you have not done so already, we recommend applying security patches relevant to your instance as soon as possible. | ||||
CVE-2025-48732 | 1 Wwbn | 1 Avideo | 2025-07-29 | 7.3 High |
An incomplete blacklist exists in the .htaccess sample of WWBN AVideo 14.4 and dev master commit 8a8954ff. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to a arbitrary code execution. An attacker can request a .phar file to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
CVE-2024-30103 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Office, Outlook | 2025-07-16 | 8.8 High |
Microsoft Outlook Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
CVE-2024-51745 | 1 Bytecodealliance | 1 Wasmtime | 2025-07-13 | N/A |
Wasmtime is a fast and secure runtime for WebAssembly. Wasmtime's filesystem sandbox implementation on Windows blocks access to special device filenames such as "COM1", "COM2", "LPT0", "LPT1", and so on, however it did not block access to the special device filenames which use superscript digits, such as "COM¹", "COM²", "LPT⁰", "LPT¹", and so on. Untrusted Wasm programs that are given access to any filesystem directory could bypass the sandbox and access devices through those special device filenames with superscript digits, and through them gain access peripheral devices connected to the computer, or network resources mapped to those devices. This can include modems, printers, network printers, and any other device connected to a serial or parallel port, including emulated USB serial ports. Patch releases for Wasmtime have been issued as 24.0.2, 25.0.3, and 26.0.1. Users of Wasmtime 23.0.x and prior are recommended to upgrade to one of these patched versions. There are no known workarounds for this issue. Affected Windows users are recommended to upgrade. | ||||
CVE-2024-28246 | 1 Katex | 1 Katex | 2025-07-12 | 5.5 Medium |
KaTeX is a JavaScript library for TeX math rendering on the web. Code that uses KaTeX's `trust` option, specifically that provides a function to blacklist certain URL protocols, can be fooled by URLs in malicious inputs that use uppercase characters in the protocol. In particular, this can allow for malicious input to generate `javascript:` links in the output, even if the `trust` function tries to forbid this protocol via `trust: (context) => context.protocol !== 'javascript'`. Upgrade to KaTeX v0.16.10 to remove this vulnerability. | ||||
CVE-2025-1716 | 1 Mmaitre314 | 1 Picklescan | 2025-07-12 | N/A |
picklescan before 0.0.21 does not treat 'pip' as an unsafe global. An attacker could craft a malicious model that uses Pickle to pull in a malicious PyPI package (hosted, for example, on pypi.org or GitHub) via `pip.main()`. Because pip is not a restricted global, the model, when scanned with picklescan, would pass security checks and appear to be safe, when it could instead prove to be problematic. | ||||
CVE-2025-29822 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel, Onenote | 2025-07-08 | 7.8 High |
Incomplete list of disallowed inputs in Microsoft Office OneNote allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. | ||||
CVE-2024-23336 | 1 Mybb | 1 Mybb | 2025-06-30 | 5 Medium |
MyBB is a free and open source forum software. The default list of disallowed remote hosts does not contain the `127.0.0.0/8` block, which may result in a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The Configuration File's _Disallowed Remote Addresses_ list (`$config['disallowed_remote_addresses']`) contains the address `127.0.0.1`, but does not include the complete block `127.0.0.0/8`. MyBB 1.8.38 resolves this issue in default installations. Administrators of installed boards should update the existing configuration (`inc/config.php`) to include all addresses blocked by default. Additionally, users are advised to verify that it includes any other IPv4 addresses resolving to the server and other internal resources. Users unable to upgrade may manually add 127.0.0.0/8' to their disallowed address list. | ||||
CVE-2024-54149 | 1 Wintercms | 1 Winter | 2025-06-24 | 8.5 High |
Winter is a free, open-source content management system (CMS) based on the Laravel PHP framework. Winter CMS prior to versions 1.2.7, 1.1.11, and 1.0.476 allow users with access to the CMS templates sections that modify Twig files to bypass the sandbox placed on Twig files and modify resources such as theme customisation values or modify, or remove, templates in the theme even if not provided direct access via the permissions. As all objects passed through to Twig are references to the live objects, it is also possible to also manipulate model data if models are passed directly to Twig, including changing attributes or even removing records entirely. In most cases, this is unwanted behavior and potentially dangerous. To actively exploit this security issue, an attacker would need access to the Backend with a user account with any of the following permissions: `cms.manage_layouts`; `cms.manage_pages`; or `cms.manage_partials`. The Winter CMS maintainers strongly recommend that these permissions only be reserved to trusted administrators and developers in general. The maintainers of Winter CMS have significantly increased the scope of the sandbox, effectively making all models and datasources read-only in Twig, in versions 1.2.7, 1.1.11, and 1.0.476. Thse who cannot upgrade may apply commit fb88e6fabde3b3278ce1844e581c87dcf7daee22 to their Winter CMS installation manually to resolve the issue. In the rare event that a Winter user was relying on being able to write to models/datasources within their Twig templates, they should instead use or create components to make changes to their models. | ||||
CVE-2025-24388 | 2025-06-16 | 3.8 Low | ||
A vulnerability in the OTRS Admin Interface and Agent Interface (versions before OTRS 8) allow parameter injection due to for an autheniticated agent or admin user. This issue affects: * OTRS 7.0.X * OTRS 8.0.X * OTRS 2023.X * OTRS 2024.X * OTRS 2025.X * ((OTRS)) Community Edition: 6.0.x Products based on the ((OTRS)) Community Edition also very likely to be affected | ||||
CVE-2025-1484 | 2025-05-30 | 6.5 Medium | ||
A vulnerability exists in the media upload component of the Asset Suite versions listed below. If successfully exploited an attacker could impact the confidentiality or integrity of the system. An attacker can use this vulnerability to construct a request that will cause JavaScript code supplied by the attacker to execute within the user’s browser in the context of that user’s session with the application. | ||||
CVE-2025-46417 | 2025-04-29 | N/A | ||
The unsafe globals in Picklescan before 0.0.25 do not include ssl. Consequently, ssl.get_server_certificate can exfiltrate data via DNS after deserialization. | ||||
CVE-2022-35962 | 1 Zulip | 1 Zulip | 2025-04-23 | 8 High |
Zulip is an open source team chat and Zulip Mobile is an app for iOS and Andriod users. In Zulip Mobile through version 27.189, a crafted link in a message sent by an authenticated user could lead to credential disclosure if a user follows the link. A patch was released in version 27.190. | ||||
CVE-2017-7540 | 1 Safemode Project | 1 Safemode | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
rubygem-safemode, as used in Foreman, versions 1.3.2 and earlier are vulnerable to bypassing safe mode limitations via special Ruby syntax. This can lead to deletion of objects for which the user does not have delete permissions or possibly to privilege escalation. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000095 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Script Security, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
The default whitelist included the following unsafe entries: DefaultGroovyMethods.putAt(Object, String, Object); DefaultGroovyMethods.getAt(Object, String). These allowed circumventing many of the access restrictions implemented in the script sandbox by using e.g. currentBuild['rawBuild'] rather than currentBuild.rawBuild. Additionally, the following entries allowed accessing private data that would not be accessible otherwise due to script security: groovy.json.JsonOutput.toJson(Closure); groovy.json.JsonOutput.toJson(Object). | ||||
CVE-2016-7032 | 2 Redhat, Todd Miller | 2 Enterprise Linux, Sudo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
sudo_noexec.so in Sudo before 1.8.15 on Linux might allow local users to bypass intended noexec command restrictions via an application that calls the (1) system or (2) popen function. | ||||
CVE-2015-5946 | 1 Sugarcrm | 1 Sugarcrm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in SuiteCRM 7.2.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code by uploading a file with an executable extension. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000107 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Script Security | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Script Security Plugin did not apply sandboxing restrictions to constructor invocations via positional arguments list, super constructor invocations, method references, and type coercion expressions. This could be used to invoke arbitrary constructors and methods, bypassing sandbox protection. | ||||
CVE-2017-1000096 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Arbitrary code execution due to incomplete sandbox protection: Constructors, instance variable initializers, and instance initializers in Pipeline scripts were not subject to sandbox protection, and could therefore execute arbitrary code. This could be exploited e.g. by regular Jenkins users with the permission to configure Pipelines in Jenkins, or by trusted committers to repositories containing Jenkinsfiles. |